Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

That's where it all started, but where did the circle jerk take place on this? Typically when these false narratives crop up and there is wide-spread momentum like this, there was a circle jerk somewhere on the internet. I know the q anon forums had all the tards there saying this stupid shit (how all those morons were doing so much research (and they claim to be ~~~oh so knowledgeable~~~ about ww2) that someone didn't bust up the man on man handjobs going on while people were talking about this).

My uncle, who is a gen x'er as well, definitely does not follow the q tard stuff, and he, out of nowhere, is parroting that NatSoc is nothing more than a blurry form of cummunism; he only reads MSM stuff. So I'm assuming the cuckservative MSM began to recycle the Trump Organization's Q brand propaganda, and the word was put out in the cuckservative MSM news, can anyone confirm this? I don't watch that TV or go to those websites, so I wouldn't know what's been there.

an aside for q tards reading this:

For any q tards reading this, I will not be giving you a history lesson. If you think NatSoc was communism/socialism just go read a fucking textbook, you retard - NO ONE ever said NatSoc resembled socialism until the Jew Bernie touted socialism on his platform - then you people, as per usual in america, misinterpreted words. I'm american. Also, if you wish to say NatSoc is socialism then you have to admit socialism was successful once, so successful that everything americans, and the world for that matter, have marveled over was created by the Third Reich. And we all know socialism doesn't work, therefore you know you're incorrect. Just stfu - you're wrong.

Does anyone know where the circle jerk started or is continuing to happen? Might help bust up the boomers' and wannabe boomers' (gen x) narrative.

That's where it all started, but where did the circle jerk take place on this? Typically when these false narratives crop up and there is wide-spread momentum like this, there was a circle jerk somewhere on the internet. I know the q anon forums had all the tards there saying this stupid shit (how all those morons were doing so much research (and they claim to be \~\~\~oh so knowledgeable\~\~\~ about ww2) that someone didn't bust up the man on man handjobs going on while people were talking about this). My uncle, who is a gen x'er as well, definitely does not follow the q tard stuff, and he, out of nowhere, is parroting that NatSoc is nothing more than a blurry form of cummunism; he only reads MSM stuff. So I'm assuming the cuckservative MSM began to recycle the Trump Organization's Q brand propaganda, and the word was put out in the cuckservative MSM news, can anyone confirm this? I don't watch that TV or go to those websites, so I wouldn't know what's been there. an aside for q tards reading this: [For any q tards reading this, I will not be giving you a history lesson. If you think NatSoc was communism/socialism just go read a fucking textbook, you retard - NO ONE ever said NatSoc resembled socialism until the Jew Bernie touted socialism on his platform - then you people, as per usual in america, misinterpreted words. I'm american. Also, if you wish to say NatSoc is socialism then you have to admit socialism was successful once, so successful that everything americans, and the world for that matter, have marveled over was created by the Third Reich. And we all know socialism doesn't work, therefore you know you're incorrect. Just stfu - you're wrong. ](#spoiler) Does anyone know where the circle jerk started or is continuing to happen? Might help bust up the boomers' and wannabe boomers' (gen x) narrative.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt 4y

But goyim, what does NatSoc stand for?

[–] • 0 pt 4y

It's semantic bullshit. The modern use of the word "socialism" is to basically mean "marxism but not quite communism, more like a lesser communism". This was not the way that hitler used the word "socialism".

[–] • 0 pt 4y

Uhhhh, that is pretty much how Hitler used the word communism. What do you mean?

[–] • 0 pt 4y

Uhhhhhhh no it isn’t. Go search up how hitler defined national socialism. Hitler rejected marxism.

[–] • 0 pt 4y (edited 4y)

What im saying is hitler rejected socialism amd communism and marxism. And that national socialism is not socialism

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt 4y

Hitler called himself a socialist you stupid fuck.

[–] • 0 pt 4y

Hitler called himself a socialist

Do you really believe you came in here "dropping truth bombs" or whatever? Do you believe you have changed anyones mind in any way?

Why or why not?

[–] • 0 pt 4y

What he meant with the word was different, though. He elaborated on this himself. In his view, the marxists co-opted the word 'socialism' for their own use, and subverted the meaning. Marxist socialism is different from national socialism, end of story. Don't get stuck on how the word is spelled (semantics), because it's the meaning that matters.

[–] • 0 pt 4y

stupid fuck

Oh my! This... This changes everything!!

You qtards are unbelievably stupid. First of all, the counter evidence to two points youre making are written in the op. This implies youre illiterate, similiar to my main gen x contact whos the qtard i hear most of this parroted bs from.

Hitler said he was a socialist?

Hitler was, in fact, not a socialist.

[–] • 0 pt 4y (edited 4y)

Razorfist has the same problem with understanding how it works. Japan is also somewhat nationalist socialist, but they flew under the radar because they paid lip service to America and the West.