Oh the what if game. I know how to play! If someone is not smart enough to have a honest discussion and uses argumentum ad hominem in the emotive form to try to support their argument by targeting the character, rather then letting their ideas stand the scrutiny of the scientific process and consensus then they are likely hopeless to the idea of other world views.
There is no arguing with someone who's absolutely refuses to listen to reason for 4 goddamn years and who's movement has literally not yielded anything yet still act like they have the right to be smug arrogant faggots.
But hey if you want to argue with a brick wall feel free.
(post is archived)