WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Its pointing to that Brunsen case, having a huge part of congress ineligible will be a $hit show for sure.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Yes - I'm putting myself out on a limb with that one - but believe that the SC was sending more than one message with that Roe vs. Wade reversal. If SC decides against Brunson, the bright side is that we'll know for certain that EVERY part of our government faiedl us - There will be no questions remaining.

That being said, I think the sixth will be a turning point in a good way.

[–] 1 pt

I have a good feeling, he described a very helpful clerk, very interesting , as if they were looking for exactly the right case.

[–] 1 pt

Yes - and the way they framed the case to bypass lower courts and require no direct proof of election fraud is genius. If this goes through, we'll see it apply to other cases as well - like Lake's.

[–] 1 pt

we have a shot, that for sure, I made it all this way!