WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

953

Posted at 4:32 PM

The Vice President did indeed have the power to send Electoral Votes back to State Legislatures for reapproval despite the constant drum from Democrats and RINOS that he “ABSOLUTELY DID NOT.” BUT, they just put CLARIFYING language in the disgraceful “OMINOUS” BILL, making sure that A V.P. DOESN’T DO WHAT THEY ALL SAID COULD NOT BE DONE. So why the new language? Because it was just another political Con Job!

In this post, Trump drops a [b] and transposes 'ni' to 'in'

Definition of Ominous:

  • Menacing; threatening.
  • Of or being an omen, especially an evil one.
  • Of or pertaining to an omen or to omens; being or exhibiting an omen; significant; portentous; foreboding or foreshadowing evil; inauspicious.
Posted at 4:32 PM *The Vice President did indeed have the power to send Electoral Votes back to State Legislatures for reapproval despite the constant drum from Democrats and RINOS that he “ABSOLUTELY DID NOT.” BUT, they just put CLARIFYING language in the disgraceful “OMINOUS” BILL, making sure that A V.P. DOESN’T DO WHAT THEY ALL SAID COULD NOT BE DONE. So why the new language? Because it was just another political Con Job!* In this post, Trump drops a [b] and transposes 'ni' to 'in' Definition of Ominous: * Menacing; threatening. * Of or being an omen, especially an evil one. * Of or pertaining to an omen or to omens; being or exhibiting an omen; significant; portentous; foreboding or foreshadowing evil; inauspicious.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Ok, so resignations and slaps on the wrist JUSTICE! and the corruption at the DOJ stands winning!

[–] 0 pt

so resignations and slaps on the wrist JUSTICE!

Not yet, but at least they aren't working in the FBI and creating more chaos. A non-corrupt court would find them guilty of treason, but we don't have that yet.

corruption at the DOJ stands

And don't forget the FBI. Yes, totally corrupt, running protection for the DS. Do you expect otherwise from a Dem controlled House? The next House intends to impeach Garland, we'll see if anything happens.

I've never made the claim that we're winning with the DOJ/FBI. It may be impossible to clean without military tribunals in the future. Until then, we keep on trying.