WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

828

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos."

Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case.

BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos." Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case. BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Absolutely the small pieces are necessary - then we have to integrate them.