Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

842

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos."

Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case.

BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos." Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case. BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 2 pts

It's looking like a bunch of circumstantial evidence with little proof. We'll see.

[–] • 2 pts

my impression is this is a setup to make Maga look like a bunch of whiners. we need Perry Mason!

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

This witness is killing it for Lake, explaining those printing errors as he did.

Edit: I mean it's not good for Lake.

[–] • 2 pts

door # 3= adjudication