Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos."

Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case.

BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

Witness is testifying he has "no doubt" that lake would have won the race without the "election chaos." Going to be quite interesting how the judge rules in this case. BTW - the opposing attorney is a partner at Marc Elias' firm.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

This witness is killing it for Lake, explaining those printing errors as he did.

Edit: I mean it's not good for Lake.

[–] • 2 pts

door # 3= adjudication

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

If this doesn't show the need for us to put elections back into the hands of We The People, I don't know what does.

There's no accountability anywhere - and they know it.

[–] • 1 pt

terrible, just terrible