Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

Seriously, why's Taibbi so hedgy about how he was anointed to release the leaks? Watch his mannerisms - shifty as heck.

Seriously, why's Taibbi so hedgy about how he was anointed to release the leaks? Watch his mannerisms - shifty as heck.

(post is archived)

[–] • 5 pts (edited )

I doubt there's anything special about WHY Taibbi and the other people were chosen, they are shitlib journalists that have been criticizing the woke left in some form. That's the common theme.

If I had to speculate, the reason they were chosen is two fold: one, they were chosen because they are shitlib journalists, which means the leftist MSM ignoring them is "notable" to shitlibs, and two because they are critical of some portions of the woke left establishment, meaning they'd be willing to actually do the story at all.

If Musk had simply shopped these to conservative journalists, that would have become the story, "Musk partners with extremist right wing journalists to defame innocent progressives!"

Choosing shitlib journalists changes the dynamic employed by the MSM in reacting to these stories, and they by necessity have to be shitlib journalists that criticize the establishment left (to some degree) or they would either not take the story or distort it beyond recognition.

His body language is shifty when he talks about it but it might just be because he's not smooth at saying "I have an NDA, I can't disclose that" or didn't want to explicitly state it that way and fumbled for a good way to say it (he is a writer, after all, not an actor or news anchor).

[–] • 1 pt

Choosing shitlib journalists changes the dynamic employed by the MSM in reacting to these stories, and they by necessity have to be shitlib journalists that criticize the establishment left (to some degree) or they would either not take the story or distort it beyond recognition.

Agree - and I'll add (as you allude to) that it also serves to run the Globalist-desired narrative and steer attention in certain directions. The Globalists don't care what happens to Twitter in the process.

[–] • 2 pts

interesting, I've watched some of Brands shows over the last couple of years. I've noticed he's been blacklisted from Hollywood stuff, he just does local comedy clubs. pretty interesting the dynamics. I think it was the Fauci virus that he was " excommunicated". I really don't know how deep he was into the " eyes wide' shut" aspect of the underground scene but my guess he was in deep . maybe not Jimmy Saville deep, but he was married to Katy Perry, a former gospel singer and preachers daughter whom now apparently works for the other guy!

[–] • 2 pts

IMO, Brand's take on thins is pretty accurate - He thinks outside he box which I appreciate. I also appreciate that he doesn't overlook Elon's NWO connections. And, don't forget, Elon also dated at least two satanists.

I appreciate that the Twitter corruption is being exposed - but I see an entire aspect of this being broadly hidden across MANY areas - elections, disinfo, diital ID, etc - and am deeply disturbed by it.

[–] • 2 pts

I think I follow ya, it's almost like the entire propaganda machine knows it's going to take a major hit, so discord and distraction in the form of managed ,controlled fires , even if they are truthful will do less damage in the long run . Hey, we've learned to get our best information from our enemies, ( I mean that in a general way as in enemies of mankind) So much stuff dropping, Kennedy stuff, just over whelming . GodBless

[–] • 2 pts

YES - It's the same thing we've seen with elections, right? I KNOW this network, and I'm telling you, Zom, we are being massively deceived.

[–] • 1 pt

He wont say because he went through twitter legal and isnt allowed to say.

[–] • 0 pt

Isn't twitter supposed to be about transparency now?

[–] • 0 pt

Not impressive. That explains why he's a liberal reporter

[–] • 3 pts

Right - and you know as well as I do why he couldn't answer that question - bc he was chosen to steer the narrative in a certain direction. It doesn't matter what Twitter reveals - What matters is that the underlying disinfo/censorship structure remains intact - just like our election system - no one's addressing the SYSTEM. This thing is so pervasive and is so suppressed even by people like Kash and Bannon, that it's increasingly difficult to believe that anyone is working in our favor. It pains me to say that, but after a certain point, I have to face facts.