The first time I experienced a 'vote more than one' was in a corrupt organization that had a run-off round when needed to elect its board and officers. They pushed the vote more than one idea to the masses but instructed their minions on how to vote for their few choices on board and not the full number you can vote for. They had their minions vote only ONE for other offices. The vote for the opposition was always split and diluted with more than one candidate and opposition candidates rarely made it to run-offs as the decision was over at the first round. It took forever to educate the old members and then the new members on vote strategy because it required finding voters (usually unknown until the election day gathering due to privacy rules), finding their faction, then one-to-one meetings on how the strategy worked and too much time explaining past results. The corrupt kept their grip and it became a waste of time and effort to get the correct representation so that I don't shivagit about it and don't support it. Organizations can come and go. The USA however is not a waste of time to try to educate the voter. If Rs want to beat the new ranked voting scam, then they need to put forth ONE official candidate. This country can't be left to the corrupt communists to cheat, lie, and steel from us.