Alex Jones is a traitor and a liar. That is all.
>Alex Jones is a traitor and a liar. That is all.
I must respectfully disagree.
Having met judas jones on several occasions, and knowing a number of people who have worked for him (none of them have anything good to say in his behalf), jones is also a zionist cocksucker.
As is anyone who stands with him.
I am looking at this from the perspective of those in the Q movement, and what Q told us, and what we have seen since.
This is the opinion I have formed, and I am entitled to it.
I am not disagreeing with you.
Fair enough.
I completely wrote jones off back in 2002, several years prior to "Big Jew" underwriting the infowars empire.
Having Q cosign my assessment was an added bonus!
I'd like to see some evidence of that claim, if you have some. I've read similar claims, but nothing that all his work over the last 30+ years, trying, like we are, to share info and exposing corruption and the evil people behind the "curtains", would warrant calling him a liar and traitor. I'm sure he gets death threats by the alphabet folks all the time.
Edit: Btw, I'm not a paid supporter of AJ, or anything like that. I'm just not willing to throw a blanket label on someone that's done a lot to try to save this country from Globalists. Understanding the tools the entire DS ises to coerce opposition is helpful.
Then you have not done enough work. Q warned us about AJ, and AJ lied right to our faces about Q.
Please go and read the posts properly. He is suspected of been MOS.
That's enough. AJ and his shills are all over the internet, and I am not having people on this board (a Q board) sucking AJs dick.
AJ is not in good standing with Q, or those of us studiying this movement from the start.
Believe whatever you want, I have made up my mind. We are not beginners here, and AJ is low brow MSM crap for Normies.
Thanks.
NMBRFG.
I've spend a lot of time on this. A couple posts come to mind, 2089, 2123 & 2166....
During that time, I found this:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Al+Jazeera+qanon&bext=wcr&atb=v100-1&ia=web
So maybe it's not the AJ some of us originally thought. IDK for sure. I'd be nice to get some clarification though...
(post is archived)