![This is a fun little nugget making it's rounds today. [634x1280 - 131KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/tjj8yq.jpg){kind=link}
Typical Qtard. Throw enough shit at the wall and when something sticks pretend it's significant. Although every one of those posts I've looked into was photoshopped. But seriously, he just posted a time of day with no further reference. Arrests or gtfo! And your own guys getting arrested don't count.
Yep, the Exact same energy could be used to prove internet horoscopes are true as well.
Reminds me of a skeptic group ran some study of unsuspecting participants, sent them 'legit personalised horoscopes' for an entire month with a lengthy detailed questionnaire form to complete afterwards. Essentially concurring the persons belief that the horoscope described events that happened to them and it was personally relevant to them etc. Then ran another month with them but now switched horoscopes with purposely incorrect birth dates/ personal details etc. With another detailed follow up questionnaire. The individuals also all agreed that these 'incorrect' horoscopes were relevant to their personal life and could tie in the horoscope reading to actual events in their life etc.
I see this as a major part of Q. One can't really disprove something if another believes something is tangentially true, bc it's based on their personal belief it's true.
I just thought is was fun. I love you baby
(post is archived)