![This is a fun little nugget making it's rounds today. [634x1280 - 131KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/tjj8yq.jpg){kind=link}
4:49...hmmm.
Pretty cool.
4:49...hmmm.
Pretty cool.
Wasn't there a war over two-hundred years ago where it was made clear how few fucks we give about British royality? Did someone not get the memo?
Wasn't there a war over two-hundred years ago where it was made clear how few fucks we give about British royality? Did someone not get the memo?
The flags at half staff is bullshit.
The flags at half staff is bullshit.
Very cool. Future proves past.
Very cool. Future proves past.
So the day of the announcement of the Queen 's demise, I went to a kids high school volleyball game in a very hoity toity area. They kicked it off with the national anthem sung by some local celebrity. She intro'd it with, "This is in honor of her majesty the queen." I couldn't stop laughing!! I had to walk outside.
So the day of the announcement of the Queen 's demise, I went to a kids high school volleyball game in a very hoity toity area. They kicked it off with the national anthem sung by some local celebrity. She intro'd it with, "This is in honor of her majesty the queen."
I couldn't stop laughing!! I had to walk outside.
WTH? So she actually died in 2019?
WTH?
So she actually died in 2019?
I wouldn't doubt it.
I wouldn't doubt it.
Ben Fulford reported Lizzie the Lizard died a few years back. But everything he says needs to be taken with a grain or two of salt.
Ben Fulford reported Lizzie the Lizard died a few years back. But everything he says needs to be taken with a grain or two of salt.
and of course when the post came out there were 20 different 'proof' videos that Q was a genius, each different. This is what is called a self-reinforcing delusion.
and of course when the post came out there were 20 different 'proof' videos that Q was a genius, each different. This is what is called a self-reinforcing delusion.
Joined a year ago. Low activity. Of course chimes in on this post. You people stand out so much. You suck at your job.
Joined a year ago. Low activity. Of course chimes in on this post. You people stand out so much. You suck at your job.
If the times were off by just one minute, would this "proof" be making the rounds? We see what we want to see and reinforce that which we desperately want to hold true. This is how superstition began.
We celebrate those who overcome the odds and succeed in business, love or life in general. We rarely hear about the many, many people who did not succeed even when following the same course of action. This is the human way and it is flawed as we all are.
If the times were off by just one minute, would this "proof" be making the rounds? We see what we want to see and reinforce that which we desperately want to hold true. This is how superstition began.
We celebrate those who overcome the odds and succeed in business, love or life in general. We rarely hear about the many, many people who did not succeed even when following the same course of action. This is the human way and it is flawed as we all are.
Typical Qtard. Throw enough shit at the wall and when something sticks pretend it's significant. Although every one of those posts I've looked into was photoshopped. But seriously, he just posted a time of day with no further reference. Arrests or gtfo! And your own guys getting arrested don't count.
Typical Qtard. Throw enough shit at the wall and when something sticks pretend it's significant. Although every one of those posts I've looked into was photoshopped. But seriously, he just posted a time of day with no further reference. Arrests or gtfo! And your own guys getting arrested don't count.
Yep, the Exact same energy could be used to prove internet horoscopes are true as well.
Reminds me of a skeptic group ran some study of unsuspecting participants, sent them 'legit personalised horoscopes' for an entire month with a lengthy detailed questionnaire form to complete afterwards. Essentially concurring the persons belief that the horoscope described events that happened to them and it was personally relevant to them etc. Then ran another month with them but now switched horoscopes with purposely incorrect birth dates/ personal details etc. With another detailed follow up questionnaire. The individuals also all agreed that these 'incorrect' horoscopes were relevant to their personal life and could tie in the horoscope reading to actual events in their life etc.
I see this as a major part of Q. One can't really disprove something if another believes something is tangentially true, bc it's based on their personal belief it's true.
Yep, the Exact same energy could be used to prove internet horoscopes are true as well.
Reminds me of a skeptic group ran some study of unsuspecting participants, sent them 'legit personalised horoscopes' for an entire month with a lengthy detailed questionnaire form to complete afterwards.
Essentially concurring the persons belief that the horoscope described events that happened to them and it was personally relevant to them etc.
Then ran another month with them but now switched horoscopes with purposely incorrect birth dates/ personal details etc. With another detailed follow up questionnaire.
The individuals also all agreed that these 'incorrect' horoscopes were relevant to their personal life and could tie in the horoscope reading to actual events in their life etc.
I see this as a major part of Q.
One can't really disprove something if another believes something is tangentially true, bc it's based on their personal belief it's true.
I just thought is was fun. I love you baby
I just thought is was fun. I love you baby
(post is archived)