Well, if it's corrupt it's likely because of the people running it... Just like the entire gov for instance
What should have AJ done about that? Scream that the people running it are corrupt? And back that with what? Did he had proof?
Because well, AJ is essentially saying the entire gov is corrupt since decades, not sure just claiming ERIC is as corrupt as the rest would have made any significant difference, especially without hard evidences
likely because of the people running it... Like the entire gov for instance
100% - that';s why I said that it looks good on the surface (clean up dead voters, moved voters, etc) but it's not in good hands and has lots of back doors.. The same network running ERIC is the same network running the government.
He could have drawn attention to it so that more safeguards could be put in place.
How do you know he knew about the corruption of the ERIC system in 2016?
I had my suspicions bc of the people involved, fact that I could pretty accurately predict primary state wins (this was Bernie vs. HRC) in states with ERIC, conversation with someone from the original ERIC team, the aggressive way it was marketed, and the fact that the director left pew and set up his company a couple months before a very important election (2016 general.) I initially thought it was designed to get HRC a win - HRC former chief of staff, Tamera Luzzatto, was VP at Pew when ERIC was incubated there. Most people are probably more familiar with Luzzatto from the pizzagate stuff: https://pedogate.world/pedocrats/tamera-luzzatto/
(post is archived)