Look at the groups/people involved in the digital currency system. It's not a good thing. Look at them in talks with the fed about an Aadhaar-like system - also not a good thing.
You know what also isn't a good thing? Info Wars, including Jones, Watkins and Shroyer, in 2016 all had the information on the ERIC system they are using to rig elections. The had information about the fake testing companies. They had warnings about the fraud via election mail. In 2016! They didn't say anything - and no one else did either, including two people with direct access to Trump. And 2020 happened.
Did Jones expand his studios after 2016? just asking.
So, for the past two years we've had a bunch of stage prancers earning millions in contributions from trusting citizens. They FINALLY put out the ERIC information - unfortunately not until it was too late for states to ditch ERIC before the 2022 election. Most of the public voices believe that their knowledge extends far beyond that of any ordinary citizens, and, therefore, they're unwilling to work with anyone outside of the little cliques they've formed. In actuality, none of these people, to my observation, have a competent understanding of the election CARTEL. If they did, they wouldn't be hiring members of the cartel, and they are. But I suppose that could also be part of an undercover operation. /ss
There are FACTS available, and we need to start embracing them instead of a bunch of BS that's leading to the enslavement of every generation moving forward.
Well, maybe if you shared your sources it would help a bit more
in 2016 all had the information on the ERIC system they are using to rig elections.
What's so "sus" about that system?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Registration_Information_Center
The Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) is non-profit, organization in the United States that is operated and financed by state elections agencies and chief elections officials.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Registration_Information_Center#Operations
At least every 60 days, each ERIC state submits their voter registration data and motor vehicle licensing data to ERIC. ERIC's technical staff matches that data against data from all the other member states and Social Security death data. ERIC identifies voters who have moved, voters who have died, and voters with duplicate registrations within a state's database. States may also request National Change of Address (NCOA) reports using official data from the US Postal Service and, after federal general elections, participate in a fraud check to see if voters cast ballots in more than one state. ERIC also, by matching voter data against motor vehicle licensing data, identifies individuals who are not yet registered so election officials can provide information on how to register to vote.[citation needed]
States joining ERIC have agreed to pursue non-partisan and protective goals.[1] Participating states are required to mail notifications to people identified as eligible to vote but not registered. Between 2012 and 2018, ERIC identified 26 million persons who were eligible to cast ballots but were not registered to vote, as well as 10 million registered voters who had moved, or who appeared on more than one list.[1] Follow-up research in some states concluded that 10% to 20% of those contacted had later registered to vote, a high response rate for direct mailings. That rate suggests 2.6 million to 5.2 million of the 26 million people notified became voters.[1] ERIC’s list maintenance reports help states improve the accuracy of their voter lists by identifying voters who have moved within the state, voters who have moved from one ERIC state to another, voters who have died, and voters with duplicate registrations in the state. ERIC's Membership Agreement requires each state to request and act on at least one of these reports at a minimum of once a year, though the ERIC Membership Agreement strongly encourages states to establish a regular schedule for requesting these reports. States must act on these reports in a manner that complies with applicable federal and state law. ERIC's website publishes statistics (https://ericstates.org/statistics/) on the number of deceased voters, in-state and out-of-state movers, and duplicate registrations that it has reported to member states.Some state administrators said determining a person's current domicile can present problems.[example needed][1] Member states report that "false positives" are rare.[quantify] Unopened returned mail—evidence of a wrong address—is substantially reduced.[citation needed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Registration_Information_Center
States created ERIC to improve the accuracy of state voter registration rolls and boost access to voter registration for all American citizens. ERIC, with logistical and financial support from the Pew Charitable Trusts, was launched in 2012 by elections officials from seven states. Membership has grown to 30 states and the District of Columbia. The Pew Charitable Trusts, although integral to the creation of ERIC, now has no role with ERIC.[citation needed]
The seven states that created ERIC in 2012 were Colorado, Delaware, Maryland, Nevada, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. By 2019, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin had joined the partnership, with Texas joining in March 2020[2] and Oklahoma adopting legislation to join in April, 2021.[3] ERIC's matching software was developed by data scientist Jeff Jonas.[1] In the 2020-2021 fiscal year, its budget was slightly more than $1 million.[citation needed]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Registration_Information_Center#Governance
Each jurisdiction has a member's seat on the ERIC Board of Directors. The Board has created an executive committee and advisory committees to assist with issues related to data security and research. Key responsibilities of the Board of Directors include approving the annual budget, setting annual membership dues, and a periodic review of ERIC's Information Security Plan and policies. ERIC is governed by bylaws and a membership agreement that each state must sign before joining.[4]
Yes, ERIC looks good on the surface, but it's corrupt - it's how they're doing a lot of the cheating..
Well, if it's corrupt it's likely because of the people running it... Just like the entire gov for instance
What should have AJ done about that? Scream that the people running it are corrupt? And back that with what? Did he had proof?
Because well, AJ is essentially saying the entire gov is corrupt since decades, not sure just claiming ERIC is as corrupt as the rest would have made any significant difference, especially without hard evidences
(post is archived)