Patriot, that has been my question early on if those at the raid had the proper Scecurity Clearances ?
I know a baseline agent will have I think up to TS (maybe even SCI) - the thing here is if they have a need-to-know - this is the delineation between clearance and access - this is why we do thin under MAC (mandatory access control). I would ask the same for any politician that moves on - the clearance still may be valid until its expiration but at the time of debrief their need-to-know effectively dies. I do not know how this is affected in execpriv though.
Exactly Patriot, for me these are so automatic when I say Proper Clearance that I forget to mention the need to know. I am glad this being addressed for others to understand.
(post is archived)