typically, this is a person (3rd party) that has no vested interest in the outcome of either litigant; and is selected by the court to carry out the court's orders and carries the best interest of the court through official duties. The also advise on these matters to the judge and can act in an official capacity to review what would typically be considered' off limits' documentation such as patient and legal information.
I took this from memory as it pertains to Frye and Daubert standards relative to forensics. I am certain there will be someone with more input to tune up my recall.
as far as the SM being a ringer - it's quite possible, but all eyes will be on that SM and their qualifications (for whatever that's worth)
im taking it as a heads up. ThanQ for this
Everyone has a dog in the fight these days, always have I guess, but more divisive now, as we have no common beliefs. It's like news stories. Everything has a bent, "global warming", "extremist", "trans ". Whoever this guy or gal is, will have a prejudice.
Ugh the more I hear about courts the more I think it’s rigged. I mean who is really non bias these days with respect to trump?
(post is archived)