WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

891

Meta/Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday told highly popular podcaster Joe Rogan that Facebook algorithmically censored the Hunter Biden laptop story for 7 days on a request from the FBI to restrict election misinformation.

Suspect we will see more people thrown under the bus soon.

Meta/Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday told highly popular podcaster Joe Rogan that Facebook algorithmically censored the Hunter Biden laptop story for 7 days on a request from the FBI to restrict election misinformation. Suspect we will see more people thrown under the bus soon.

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

It isn't like he wasn't happy to do it.

[–] 1 pt

Exactly Patriot. Excellent point. His arm does not appear twisted either.

[–] 5 pts (edited )

“7 days”

Well that’s complete bullshit. They censored for several months, maybe even a whole year or more.

Also, since fucking when does LAW ENFORCEMENT get involved with election messaging. Politicians have told lies about each other for hundreds of years. Not that Trump lied about this, he didn’t. But even if he had, it’s been legal for every single politician to tell lies about their competition since the beginning of this country.

And if it falls into the realm of libel or slander (which public personalities are held at a different standard than the average person anyhow), then it gets sorted out civilly through the court system.

There is exactly fucking ZERO legal authority for the FBI to interject itself into any election in this manner.

That shit needs to be fucking addressed.

[–] 2 pts

Yeah, it's a huge overreach and blatantly political.

[–] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

So much corruption. I wonder why they use Ukraine for this stuff specifically.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Patriot, this is a old boring tactic Suckerberg is using. He wants to come across sincere and honest and the first interview always expect they will minimize their involvement. It can even start with they do not know crap. But the more interviews you have the more involvement you will find.

What is even more alarming is anyone running for office appears to be getting passes on their crimes. Example would be how Buyden openly bragged how he interfered in a investigation in Ukraine that implicated him. The brags how after they removed the investigator he and Obama sent the tax payer dollars as a reward for making the investigation go away. If we have been aware of this crap all this time so was the DOJ and FBI. Nothing happened. Why ? I agree it needs to be addressed and those involved in the crimes and covering up these crimes need to be arrested and have a court date set for their trials.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/27/flashback_2018_joe_biden_brags_at_cfr_meeting_about_withholding_aid_to_ukraine_to_force_firing_of_prosecutor.html

Note this was when he made a appearance at the CFR . So even they were made aware. Look at the Politicians who had kids were connected to Burisma.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/02/reminder-joe-biden-john-kerry-mitt-romney-the-clintons-nancy-pelosi-and-george-soros-all-have-connections-to-the-ukraine/

But when you dig into the Ukraine deeper it becomes more sinister then just a energy company. It IMO would have exposed the DS.

https://nypost.com/2020/09/23/senate-report-links-hunter-biden-to-trafficking-ring/

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/feb/04/sex-lies-psychological-scars-ukraine-human-trafficking-crisis

https://drrichswier.com/2022/03/19/ukraine-money-laundering-hub-of-the-new-world-order/

After reading this it becomes highly suspect why they all wanted investigations to go away, just look at all the suspects it would have exposed. How can they justify having no investigations on the Ukraine and those connected . This makes a strong circumstantial case of covering up crimes.

[–] 0 pt

I can buy the idea that the FBI is using big tech to break the law or otherwise rig/interfere in elections. So Zuckerberg may not be lying about that. But any company worth a shit should protest such things, if not outright refuse to do them.

Don’t forget, it was government who used private businesses to enforce all their COVID bullshit, too.

The larger issue at hand is that government doesn’t have the authority to take sides and interject themselves into the information stream of an American election…which is exactly what they are doing as outlined in both your examples and this revelation from Zuckerberg. Our government is literally doing nothing different than what the Soviet or Chinese governments do.

[–] 2 pts

so much for its just a private company and they can censor what they want argument

[–] 1 pt

Patriot, Suckerberg is a walking talking contradiction. With Congress he claims one thing and in the Civil trial he claims the opposite.

[–] 2 pts

Rogan sold out. now he's gotta do what they wanted him to do.

[–] 1 pt

this is literally the exact reason we have a 1st Amendment.

[–] 1 pt

Amen Patriot, and why they are doing all they can to remove it.