WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

703

https://www.facebook.com/WBTVNews3/posts/10158654504516455

Of course, this judgment opens up something internationally, especially here in Switzerland, this judgment should make waves, because Switzerland has a special position here with its federal constitution. On the one hand, the Nuremberg Codex in the constitution with Article 118b, and the misuse of genetic engineering in humans is prohibited in Switzerland, according to Article 119 of the Federal Constitution. This is supplemented by Article 230bis of the Criminal Code, ... Thus, the perpetrators risk up to 10 years in prison. But this judgment should also make the rest of the world sit up and take notice, because the Nuremberg Code is internationally valid and is also included in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In the case of criminal charges, the statement must include a reference to the Contergan scandal in order to give special weight to the importance of this charge. The policy is thus facing a hot autumn. Source: The source is in the link above.

https://vk.com/wall710291920_1403

https://www.facebook.com/WBTVNews3/posts/10158654504516455 Of course, this judgment opens up something internationally, especially here in Switzerland, this judgment should make waves, because Switzerland has a special position here with its federal constitution. On the one hand, the Nuremberg Codex in the constitution with Article 118b, and the misuse of genetic engineering in humans is prohibited in Switzerland, according to Article 119 of the Federal Constitution. This is supplemented by Article 230bis of the Criminal Code, ... Thus, the perpetrators risk up to 10 years in prison. But this judgment should also make the rest of the world sit up and take notice, because the Nuremberg Code is internationally valid and is also included in Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In the case of criminal charges, the statement must include a reference to the Contergan scandal in order to give special weight to the importance of this charge. The policy is thus facing a hot autumn. Source: The source is in the link above. https://vk.com/wall710291920_1403

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

This is a fake story and has been going around since at least 2021

[–] 2 pts

Seems like it, I followed half a dozen links trying to find any reference to the actual case and what the ruling was about and couldn't find it.

[–] 1 pt

The report starts with "Hardly anyone noticed", I wonder why? Could it be that it is fake news and such ruling never happened?

[–] 0 pt

could it be they do not want you to know ? like Ivermectin.

[–] 1 pt

There are sooooooooooooo many right leaning websites, news outlets, talk shows, etc who would report on this, so I don't have to trust this low quality report from covid-unmasked.net This report is probably misleadingly referring to a ruling several months ago where the SC ruled something about mandates in one particular state or one particular group of people.

[–] 0 pt (edited )
[–] 1 pt

If the case is real, let's see the written decison.