WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

224

Mr. DeFilippis oversaw the failed prosecution of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who was charged with lying to the FBI. In May, a jury in Washington, D.C., concluded that Mr. Sussmann was not guilty after about six hours of deliberation. Did Durham catch a rat ?

Mr. DeFilippis oversaw the failed prosecution of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who was charged with lying to the FBI. In May, a jury in Washington, D.C., concluded that Mr. Sussmann was not guilty after about six hours of deliberation. Did Durham catch a rat ?

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

winning

Who quits a high profile, complex case two months out? People who know its a failure and want to save face OR he/his family were threatened and he is scared.

[–] 1 pt

Patriot, I suspect that answer is coming in the near future. because Mr. DeFilippis oversaw the failed prosecution of former Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, this failure raises eyebrows and questions.

[–] 2 pts

Brother, exactly he could be a mole/rat it wouldn't be the first time.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The failed Sussman trial was to be expected in a DC court. The main purpose of that case was to unlock more info and get it on record. Durham wasn’t expecting to win that case.

Now for the prosecutor, he is working on another high profile case involving two Americans who helped ISIS. This case begins in November so Durham changed his focus as that needs preparation. Mr DeFilippis can’t work on both cases at once. He would be spread too thin.

[–] 0 pt

Patriot, thank you for the update. We question everything.

[–] 0 pt

DURham couldn't catch a cold. He's not SUPPOSED to catch anyone. Or have the intervening YEARS not showed you that?