Trump endorses predicted winners rather than endorsing candidates based on principals (dual citizen Dr Oz is a good example). The same but slightly different method he used to select his cabinet, his advisors, etc.
You obviously haven't been following the polls long before the primaries. When Trump endorsed official MAGA candidates, they were almost always trailing their GOPe primary opponents in the polls ... afterwards their poll numbers immediately began to rise. Now we have the results. The real battle will be in November against the Dem opponents and the UniParty voter fraud machine.
Oz is an exception, a real MAGA candidate like Dave McCormick would lose the PA Senate race to Oz's Dem opponent in November. Oz has a better chance to win in PA, FWIW.
Isn't Oz a trust the soylence vaxx endorsing turk roach shill ...
Isn't Oz a trust the soylence vaxx endorsing turk roach shill ...
Nailed it.
But Oz is running as an [R], his only initial worth is in gaining [R] headcount leading to a Senate Majority which will be necessary to retake all the leadership chairs in the Senate Committees. Otherwise Oz will be an unreliable RINO - however, a public great awakening and constituent pressure could push him into being a more conservative voting [R] over time. Not holding my breath, but I see him as being more flexible as the DS crimes become common knowledge.
(post is archived)