Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I'm cautiously optimistic about the idea.

The Convention of the States movement is ** pushing for such a convention.

This time, conservatives want to constitutionally reduce the size of government, make it easier to fire federal employees such as Anthony Fauci, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases' director, eliminate whole Cabinet-level agencies, and enshrine a nine-justice Supreme Court.

We should keep our eyes and efforts on this.

I'm cautiously optimistic about the idea. >The Convention of the States movement is *[just one of the organizations](https://poal.co/s/QStorm/559544)* pushing for such a convention. > This time, conservatives want to constitutionally reduce the size of government, make it easier to fire federal employees such as Anthony Fauci, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases' director, eliminate whole Cabinet-level agencies, and enshrine a nine-justice Supreme Court. We should keep our eyes and efforts on this.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (20).
[–] • 0 pt

It would be great if it was followed, but we can't act like it will never need updates. For instance, I wouldn't mind English declared the national language, the end of birthright citizenship to children with no American parents, or a fixed number of Supreme Court justices. Are there risks to a convention? Yes, but that should inspire engagement rather avoidance