Most realistically, it would be conventions rarely actually occuring, but the threat of a convention makes the federal government act. Like I put in the post, a Soros-backed convention effort already exists. That means it's better that rival efforts exist to sabotage his efforts and if they were really lucky, actually make positive changes.
The argument that something could go wrong is understandable, but it implicitly favors inaction and giving tactics to the left.
Most realistically, it would be conventions rarely actually occuring, but the threat of a convention makes the federal government act. Like I put in the post, a Soros-backed convention effort already exists. That means it's better that rival efforts exist to sabotage his efforts and if they were really lucky, actually make positive changes.
The argument that something could go wrong is understandable, but it implicitly favors inaction and giving tactics to the left.
I do not favor inaction, I simply do not favor imprudent actions, where one bets the house, the car and the firstborn on a toss of the dice....especially when The House may have loaded the dice.
I do not favor inaction, I simply do not favor imprudent actions, where one bets the house, the car and the firstborn on a toss of the dice....especially when The House may have loaded the dice.
(post is archived)