You cannot deny these things, not all of them, without either saying he was incompetent, malicious, or his opponents were smarter then him, which would be the equivalent of calling him a fool.
You have a totally different premise behind your views. There are so many in these 3 screens worth of text you typed ... no way do I have the time to address all of them on this kindle. So I'll just begin with the beginning and your portrayal of Trumps cabinet, why he allowed them in, etc.
"Some people you can't just tell them and they will believe it, you have to show them".
Trump had to let the GOPe infiltrate his cabinet because he needed to let them show their corruption. Trump was businessman turned POTUS, he had to let GOPe help with staff. IF Trump had real MAGA people in place, there would be a dysfunctional govt because the DS would have relentlessly attacked all of them, a failed term with little DS operative exposure to the masses and relentless negative MSM propaganda. Trump had to have GOPe criminals in place in order to expose them and show the people who these people really are. He did that very well while making America Great Again in spite of Congress fighting him in most cases. Net Oil Exporter, low inflation, cheap energy, high employment - life was great!
Going from that point, our views diverge too much to explain quickly. If I have time later tonight, I'll respond to some more of this "letter". Lots of your points will be moot in my mind because of this first premise explaining why. Other points you make are unanswered by this premise, those are the ones I'll answer later. I'm a 1-2 finger typist on this kindle; long drawn out comments are not for me.
I appreciate the effort you tried to put into the comment.
Regrettably it all translates as variations on the theme of "when you let your enemies kill/destroy you, you win!"
He was attacked directly through the very swamp he let in and surrounded himself with.
Why would you not start with the very best, most impregnable, advantage that you could if you knew you were going to come under attack anyway?
Doesn't even pass the smell test.
I'm a 1-2 finger typist on this kindle; long drawn out comments are not for me.
Sorry to hear that. We're probably not gonna see eye to eye on this, because I understand that for a lot of people, hope is still important, it's whats keeping them going. I still enjoy and welcome the long form debate though.
Part 2
None of this matters, because theres no precedent for withdrawing certification of a presidential election, ever. It's 100% symbolic.
Could be a constitutional crisis when enough states decertify. I'm not exactly sure what will happen other than Biden losing the levers of power and everybody learns the truth about the election, state decertification proves it for all.
It's a political stunt for the midterms. And thats the most sure indictment of the party I can think of. They're stunt men. It's a circus, and they think you're a clown.
Your "most sure indictment" of MAGA is because they are exposing truth with the receipts and you call that a stunt? Get real.
The circus is only starting. Lots will happen between now and November.
Over the rest of your letter length comment you describe the state of the corruption, how screwed up everything is, etc. I agree things are a fucking mess and in the way you describe them, I could have written most of this section.
i do not agree that there is no hope. On the contrary, I'm see a lot of winning and nervous DS bad actors doing really stupid things. I see a withering MSM, Twitter, Netflix, etc while alt news becomes more popular, more decertification momentum, Kingmaker Trump's 94/100 primary record, more Dems coming to MAGA, good SCOTUS decisions that the Dems didn't like, so much winning I can't list them all! No hope my ass. And I think That's about it.
Jesus, I can't believe I got through that monstrosity!
because they are exposing truth with the receipts and you call that a stunt? Get real.
as long as election decertification is only symbolic, it is just a circus. And it hasn't stopped being one.
"more Dems coming to MAGA"
This is not a win. These are called well-poisoners and subverters.
"i do not agree that there is no hope. "
Think of it not as 'no hope' but as hope with an asterisk next to it.
"hope for the best, but assume and prepare for the worst."
Thats all I'm really saying.
Why would you not start with the very best, most impregnable, advantage that you could if you new you were going to come under attack anyway?
Doesn't even pass the smell test.
I explained this in my last comment. A non GOPe aligned MAGA star team would have been ostracized by the Dem/GOPe and DS employees of govt, rendered totally ineffective as the swamp protects itself. It would be a waste of time, because there would be no progress revealing and draining the swamp, it would be a failed presidency. Trump needed to use the GOPe to access the levers of govt to have a successful term, to be in a position to reveal DS controlled politicians, governors, AGs, SoS's, Prosecutors, etc. to the people. To set up the sting called the 2020 election, devolution and a few other landmines.
A Precident - Ronnie Raygun had to accept GHWB as VPOTUS and a slew of GOPe in his cabinet, yet he was able to dramatcally improve the lives of Americans. He wasnt out to drain the swamp though. That's the way to succeed when the DS uniparty controls almost all the levers of power.
(post is archived)