Well said. Its forbidden history to even talk about this ancient knowledge. Even II Esdras written by Ezra documents how many of the Israelites after their deportation by the Assyrians travelled west to the land of ARSARETH that was a wilderness where no man liveth. They ended up near the Black Sea and later migrated throughout Europe. In other words, some of the true Israelites travelled into the Caucasus mountains and came to the land of Arsareth now known as Europe. The later known Saxons were a branch of that migration and had been named Saksen or Saksuna by the Assyrians which means SONS OF ISAAC. The main Assyrian deportation of the Israelites occured in 721BC where the Assyrians captured all the cities and towns of Israel and also captured the cities of Benjamin and Judah in the south except for Jerusalem where they were afterwards deported with the rest of the Tribes to the north-west never to return. This was about 120 years before the Babylonian captivity of Jerusalem and the surrounding cities. When Ezra and Nehemiah returned to Jerusalem there were only those of Judah and Benjamin that returned, being that the northern Tribes of Israel deported by the Assyrians about 120 years earlier were NEVER in Babylon. Other Isrelites went west and had permanently settled in Asia-Minor, then founded the small Trojan kingdom which was mainly agrarian. They were constantly at war with the Simeonite Greek pirates that raided and plundered their trade ships, until many years later after the fall of Troy, Brutus the Trojan brought his people to Britain where they became known as BRITONS. Its important to note that the Trojans spoke ancient Hebrew which was forever lost to Judah and Benjamin in their 70 year captivity because they lost their language and culture in Babylon. Losing their language and culture they only spoke Chaldee or Eastern Aramaic which is an admixture of Babylonian and Hebrew. The point here is that the migrating Trojans later known as Britons still spoke ancient Hebrew and kept their ancient alphabet while in Jerusalem the Babylonian "scribes" that came with Ezra from Babylon had introduced a new alphabet in quadratic script which is NOT Hebrew its Chaldee. So-called Jews today do not speak Hebrew, they speak Yiddish which is the old Khazar language and the rest that study the old texts of the Torah and Babylonian Talmud are reading Chaldee better known as Eastern Aramaic which is written in quadratic script which is definitely NOT HEBREW. The COPPER SCROLL found with the Dead Seas Scrolls was the only manuscript that was written in the ancient Hebrew or Coelbren alphabet, the rest is all Aramaic or Greek. It is these same descendants of the Trojans/Israel, known as Britons that defeated Julius Caesar in 55BC when he tried to gain a foothold in Britain. This is over 600 years before the Angles, the Saxons or the Jutes ever settled in Britain. There was no such thing as Anglo-Saxons in those days, they were Britons and they defeated the Romans with chariots, yes real chariots like they would have used in the Middle Eastern kingdoms thousands of years earlier. The Britons mowed down the Legions with thousands of these chariots and earned the reputation of being barbarians because they did not fight fairly according to the Romans. Their fighting skills had not prepared them for fighting against warriors on chariots. Their priesthood were descendants of the Levites known as Druids to the Britons which the Romans called Magi (Latin) or Wisemen. These Druids were also familiar with Isaiah's prophecy of the coming birth of Jesus. In The Gallic War written by Julius Caesar, he even decribes the alphabet of the Britons as being very similar to Greek which is also similar to Phoenician. Brutus the Trojan was a descendant of the Royal House of Judah and the British kings always claimed their ancestry from the Trojan kings. Even the Frankish kings (French) claimed their ancestry from Antenor the Trojan a direct descendant of Judah of the Royal House of Israel, its a matter of recorded history. Its also interesting to note that when the Romans were fed up of being defeated time and time again by the Britons, the Emperor Claudius gathered most of the continental legions along with four of his generals to prepare for a full assault on the tiny British Island. The Romans even brought several hundred elephants which spooked the horses that pulled the chariots of the Britons making them uncontrollable. It was the largest army ever assembled by the Romans for such a campaign. What is really interesting is that in the Edict of Claudius of 42AD, it calls for the destruction of RELIGIOUS CHRISTIAN BRITAIN, that their LIBRARIES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP and their SCHOOLS OF LEARNING all run by the Druids/Magi should be destroyed. Emperor Claudius actually names Britain as Christian which proves that the Britons were already the first Christian nation in history. Its an inconvenient truth that modern day Christianity has a difficult time explaining, especially when the Edict of Claudius also mentions LIBRARIES and SCHOOLS OF LEARNING in Britain at that time. Modern day historians balk at the idea that so-called barbarians had libraries and schools which also intimates that the Britons were not barbarians. Much of this supressed history is recorded in the British Triads and the Bruts of England. Tacitus also speaks of the capture of the High King of Britain Caradoc. It gets even more interesting when we read in the Apostolic Constitutions written by St. Peter, he names LINUS as the FIRST BISHOP of Rome whom was the son of a British King named Caradoc consecrated by St. Paul. St.Paul mentions Linus and his sister Claudia (Gladys) in II Timothy. A very inconvenient truth for the Roman Church was to hide or expunge this fact that St.Peter wrote. They continue to lie that Peter was the first Bishop of Rome. Anyway, my two cents.