![How Does A Meteor Impact Create Hexagon Imprints? [1146x265 - 376KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/kcvpJh.png){kind=link}
The odds of such impacts are statistical impossibilities which they offer as the norm.
That's a strange opinion to have given the physics involved. Think about it. Even an object crossing the Moon's orbital path exactly perpendicular will collide with the "front" of the Moon because the Moon literally runs into it. Some objects will manage to be timed just right to t-bone the Moon from the side, but it will be less likely that hitting head on.
Bluntly, the mainstream theory on planetary craters is 100% debunked bullshit.
Debunked by what? In your earlier post you say plasma discharges, but what generates the plasma, where can we see the observations of plasma discharges, and more importantly the measurements of the discharges?
Runs into them but not at perfectly perpendicular angle. That's pure fantasy devoid of thought or reason. Sure, it may happen, but it would be exceptionally rare. Absolutely not the 90% case. In fact, the bulk should be elliptical impact craters with some small number near circular. None of which explains the common hex (multifaceted) craters.
Runs into them but not at perfectly perpendicular angle.
Who says they're at a perfectly perpendicular angle? I think you're making an invalid inference based on the assumption that the crater is caused by the transfer of kinetic energy of impact. That's not how it works. When you're talking about objects moving at speeds measured in miles per second the impact isn't like a tossed stone landing in the sand, it's more like a stick of dynamite tossed onto the sand. The object is vaporized on impact, and that incredible instantaneous release of heat is an explosion.The explosion causes a circular crater no matter what angle it arrived on.
Who says they're at a perfectly perpendicular angle?
Thank you for admitting you know nothing of the topic and have never once actually looked into it.
Fin.
Sheeeeeit....
(post is archived)