You clearly don't understand the topic. I've read much on both sides. I didn't read the link because I've previously read the bogus point. The fact you don't understand what you're talking about is the issue. The fact you're claiming the defacto occurrence is rare and rare is the defacto occurrence, is why you don't understand. Before you reply, take a second to think about orbital periods and rotation and statistical angles of incidence. Now, stop dishonesty inserting bullshit like atmospheres (which you begrudgingly admit). As the topic is clearly the moon and other such bodies on which craters are well documented. Ignoring all this, bluntly, only an idiot would choose half baked theories which ignore massive elements of facts in lieu of a theory which explains everything, which is bolstered by experiment, and precisely reproduces the observable facts. Which is why I can easily declare you care not for science.