You mean the most recent 3 posts or all of Q's posts? Not sure where you are coming from.
Jim Watkins (4kun owner) verified the new Q as legit, if we can trust Jim Watkins, and I think we can. It might be a different member of Q team posting hence a shift in linguistics.
Yeah, media/DS is very fearful of Q and the anons. A formidable 4th (5th?) generation asymmetrical warfare creation they can not control or destroy.
Oh that's good to hear, about Jim Watkins.
I wasn't sure at first (the new ones) but they do sound very 'Q-esque.'
Dave (X22) said Jim Watkins verified. That was in either Thursday or Friday's X22b report.
Didn't hear that, thanks.
I meant the 3 latest. Why do you trust JW? Just asking. The change of “ style” bothered me. The first 2 sounded cribbed from earlier posts and too lacking in detail. Now the drop about a “ plant” sounds more like Q. But still different somehow. Can’t put my finger on it just yet but something is different. Maybe a different writer someone who hasn’t posted before and is trying to find the “ style”?
Some studies claim to have narrowed it down to two writing styles:
90% trust. He owns/protects 8kun, must have had some collaboration with Q at least in the early days, CodeMonkey (Jim's son) has made huge contributions to the effort, etc. etc. I don't know the guy, I think he's a bit whackey, but to each their own.
I think it's a different Q writer, so a slight perceived shift in linguistics. I speculate ...
RedPil78, Jordan Sather and Dave (X22) have been skeptical too, but with Jim's verification are moving forward as if this is real Q.
(post is archived)