![Clandestine makes some good points, especially on the wild Q decodes and overreaching of proofs, but he really put me off on how highly he thinks of himself. "Q Thought-Leader" lays down the law authoritative like. We don't need leaders in our community, or want them. We are anons, no more, no less. [888x312 - 77KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/PlaOD1.png){kind=link}
Every proof and decode is wild. Every single one of them. Every single time dots are connected, they could easily not be connected if logic is applied. There is no proof. None. All of the proofs are complete garbage. Hilarious that a group that says “there are no coincidences“ completely put all of their stock in what could absolutely be coincidence. But since there “are no coincidences” that proves it’s true. Do you see how hilarious that is?
The guy who completely relies on coincidences says there are no coincidences, so that when coincidences turn up, it’s proof. I can’t believe people fall for this. It’s hilarious! What children!
Every proof and decode is wild. Every single one of them. Every single time dots are connected, they could easily not be connected if logic is applied. There is no proof. None. All of the proofs are complete garbage. Hilarious that a group that says “there are no coincidences“ completely put all of their stock in what could absolutely be coincidence. But since there “are no coincidences” that proves it’s true. Do you see how hilarious that is?
The guy who completely relies on coincidences says there are no coincidences, so that when coincidences turn up, it’s proof. I can’t believe people fall for this. It’s hilarious! What children!
(post is archived)