![Remember the 24 hour rule anons, and always use discernment. These new Q posts are starting to stink, and we must be careful. I'm still open to Q's return, but I'm not gonna jump right on it out of hopium. Screenshots in the post content.[378x679 - 364KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/5gCGbR.png){kind=link}
IMO, if it isn't Q, then we will soon know.
After all we have learned from Q, of which, all have turned out to be based info. I'm pretty certain, if in fact, Q has been hacked, I would bank on it being dealt with pretty quickly and thoroughly.
I wonder, if only one was just a hack and the other two were in response to.
And Lakota's post makes some very good points. They sure jumped pretty quick to push a narrative.
Nonetheless, Q is not one to negate, or mess with.
Q will handle it. I am sure of that, if it isn't Q.
IMO, if it isn't Q, then we will soon know.
After all we have learned from Q, of which, all have turned out to be based info. I'm pretty certain, if in fact, Q has been hacked, I would bank on it being dealt with pretty quickly and thoroughly.
I wonder, if only one was just a hack and the other two were in response to.
And Lakota's post makes some very good points. They sure jumped pretty quick to push a narrative.
Nonetheless, Q is not one to negate, or mess with.
Q will handle it. I am sure of that, if it isn't Q.
And Lakota's post makes some very good points. They sure jumped pretty quick to push a narrative.
Yes - have so many questions about this
>And Lakota's post makes some very good points. They sure jumped pretty quick to push a narrative.
Yes - have so many questions about this @LakotaPride
(post is archived)