>Well this ought to get the left's panties in a bunch. Imagine the Supreme Court making gay marriages illegal like the will of the people wanted in the first place. California disregarded the will of the people and pushed gay marriage through Sacramento. 6 months earlier the question was put on the ballots and it was clearly turned down. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pitched the idea of revisiting other major cases after the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Thomas voted with the majority in the reversal of the landmark case and discussed the possibility in his concurring opinion, drawing comparisons between abortion and other cases that have been seen by the Supreme Court in recent years. “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” Thomas wrote, “Because any substantive due process decision is “demonstrably erroneous,” […] we have a duty to “correct the error” established in those precedents.” Griswold v. Connecticut was a 1965 case in which the use of contraception by two married individuals was private and protected by the constitution. Lawrence v. Texas was a 2003 case dealing with homosexual sex between two consenting parties, and Obergefell v. Hodges was the 2015 case which would make homosexual marriage constitutionally protected. Thomas called these rulings “demonstrably erroneous” and speculated that Roe v. Wade may be the first of multiple cases to consider for their unconsitutionality. a bunch.