Thanks so much for your thoughtful reply. You make really good points, particularly when Kash said that our "conspiracy theories only need a little tweaking." That was one of the more positive aspects of what Kash said, IMO too. I just think back on how POTUS responded to the pounding of questions about "Q" and sure, he didn't come out and say he's behind it, but he sure sounded a lot more endorsing of our movement, saying things like, "They love our country" and "They really seem to like me (POTUS)" and "They can't stand what's happening in our liberal cities" - things of that nature. And when that witch anchor at that Town Hall interview and the other "reporter" at that WH press briefing were breathing down POTUS' neck about what they referred to as "QAnon" who believes that Trump is "saving the world from Satanic pedos", Trump didn't say we were/are "conspiracy theorists" at all. Instead, he just said, "Would that be a BAD thing?" and he changed the subject to the loony libs burning down many Dem-controlled cities. The vibe I was getting from Kash about the Q movement was that he only includes us in his outreach because we make up a big constituency of Trump's supporters (as if we're nothing more than a Trump voting block) - not because we're truth evangelists or red pill dispensers bringing value to waking up America from their slumber. It felt like he wasn't even supporting our Digital Soldier mission whatsoever. But that's just how I saw it. I know he's a patriot and has done a lot of good. It just would have meant a lot if Kash had used that opportunity to acknowledge the Q movement's legitimacy or value in some way, even while distancing himself from being 'a part of it.'