Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

The FBI ran the Jan 6 Insurrection Operation through Alex Jones

Alex KNOWINGLY helped the FBI Who is ray epps? Is he well known? How many times has Alex told us he is well connected ( contacts with FBI)

Alex pushed the storming narrative ( through Info Wars ) setting the trap for Trump..

Don't believe me? why hasn't the Jan 6 Committee interviewed Alex Jones? Alex is a higher up in QAnon as they tell us he is...

Coincidence? How many coincidences have to happen before it becomes fact?

The FBI ran the Jan 6 Insurrection Operation through Alex Jones Alex KNOWINGLY helped the FBI Who is ray epps? Is he well known? How many times has Alex told us he is well connected ( contacts with FBI) Alex pushed the storming narrative ( through Info Wars ) setting the trap for Trump.. Don't believe me? why hasn't the Jan 6 Committee interviewed Alex Jones? Alex is a higher up in QAnon as they tell us he is... Coincidence? How many coincidences have to happen before it becomes fact?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (26).
[–] • 3 pts

they are afraid of Q and the FBI has an investigation into " QANON".. and why not interview AJ.
Charge him like the others? he is the one behind QANON ( QANON is not Q )

that would tie it up for them and have us all convicted... Think about this for a while ....Digest it a bit

[–] • 0 pt

I don't think you understand my point. Maybe you should look up what the definition of proof is. Your post is speculation, not proof. It could very well be true for all I know but your opinion is definitely not actually proof.

[–] • 2 pts

the fact that AJ knew who Ray Epps was and did nothing to remove him?

Not even using his Broadcasting Company to get the word out the FBI is involved in this Info Wars Calling to storm the capitol? that is was the FBI doing, not his? the FACT neither of them have been interviewed ...
You must believe in coincidence?

How many coincidences have to happen before it is called a fact?

[–] • 1 pt

I'm not arguing about your point. I even said you might be right. I am saying that your OPINION is not "PROOF" THAT IS ALL. Can't you understand that?