![So on the same day, Trump re-truths a Q meme and Durham is seen in public as the trial starts. 5:5 [462x705 - 146KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/wjYoVF.png){kind=link}
https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/Five_by_five
5:5 isn't "five-by-five", that would be 5x5
5:5 is a ratio, in other words "five for every five". So 5:5 == 1:1
5:5 isn't "five-by-five", that would be 5x5
5:5 is a ratio, in other words "five for every five". So 5:5 == 1:1
5:5 is a way of saying it. Explicitly stated as such by Q. Which is the context. Purposely misconstruing as a ratio well outside of a mathematical context is next tier retardation.
The only remaining question is, how many people will now stand up to prove they are next tier retarded?
5:5 is a way of saying it. Explicitly stated as such by Q. Which is the context. Purposely misconstruing as a ratio well outside of a mathematical context is next tier retardation.
The only remaining question is, how many people will now stand up to prove they are next tier retarded?
Explicitly stated as such by Q.
All I wanted to hear you say.
> Explicitly stated as such by Q.
All I wanted to hear you say.
(post is archived)