Violence - or even a threat of violenc
I have suggested neither. I object to the very implication. Having the physical materials for self defense is not the same thing as violence, or even the threat of it.
The regime is full of paranoids who full well know that even as recently as the fifties, half of what they've done in broad daylight would and could have resorted in actual lynchings. and regime officials are in that mindset today, while americans have been incredibly far and beyond patient with their overreach and continual degradation, impositions, mass defamation as 'terrorists', abuses of the public and public protest, and on and on and on.
We have been, if not forgiving, incredibly patient with the utter lawlessness and contempt they've treated the american public with.
Understand, if you are here, you are or can already be, labelled a potential domestic violent extremist (DVE), or domestic militia extremist (DME). And you are likely already on a watchlist. These things by themselves, the attempt at a no-fly list, using the no-fly list for gun bans, even the attempts, should be sufficient cause for outrage.
Never the less us americans have remained patient.
The fact is they will continue to label millions of us. They will up the ante, and the rhetoric, regardless of what any of us does or doesn't do, regardless of what any of us says or chooses to self-censor.
What you have written is nothing but a blatant incompetent and hamfisted attempt at demoralization.
and your only tactic here is the same as every informant online that I've ever seen: "don't fight back, dont speak out. Thats what THEY want!"
Its a variation of the old saw "now see what you made me do?"
I ain't buying it, not for one minute. You and yours are gonna be thrown off like a bad cold, and sent packing to whatever god-forsaken country you're from:
- a certain asian nation that shall not be named
- israel
- britain
- new zealand
- germany
- ukraine
- langley or other affiliates (in which case you need driven into the sea).
Wow, you couldn't be more wrong about me - who I am, where I come from, everything you made assumptions about in your entire post. For starters, I was born and raised in Texas. My first election when I was old enough to vote was voting for Ronald Reagan and I went to his inauguration in DC as a teenager.
I was the Editor of the Young Republicans newsletter and part of the Young Republicans in college and have never missed a single election voting all my life except for a primary due to being in the hospital. I've never voted for even ONE Democrat my entire life and I vote for Trump in the 2016 & 2020 primary and general elections.
Furthermore, I'm a gun enthusiast and have a License to Carry - which is a VERY rigorous process in my state, requiring extensive background checks, fingerprints, written exam, and marksmanship live fire test.
What I didn't like about what you said in your prior post was re: "sending a message by mass ammo purchases of a million dollars at a time" (paraphrasing) - which, to me, sounded like advertising a threat of violence from the public. Perhaps I misinterpreted the intention of your statement, but everything I stated in my reply re: the potential consequences of 'advertising a perceived threat of violence' remains valid and doing anything like that would be very dangerous in my opinion.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. The difference is whether or not someone presents their opinion in a respectful vs. personal attack type of way. Clearly, you chose the latter.
sounded like advertising a threat
First I don't believe any of your background. You sound like a shill listing off some bs profile. Gut says you're some dipshit in a fusion center or police department.
Second it sounds nothing like a threat. The exercise of a right, including the NGO/poltical lobby organized purchase of ammunition, cannot be converted into a crime, a privilege, or cause. And no everyone is not entitled to their opinion on this, because it is not a matter of opinion or debate. It's a matter of the legal definition.
I not only don't know you, I don't respect you. Why should I? I can and will treat with open hostility anyone and everyone that misconstrues my words, implies anything out of context, or otherwise tries to defame or slander me or the intent of my words.
If you don't want to be treated as someone poisoning the well, or a fed manufacturing an entrapment case over some handwringing "oh golly, he just sounded so extreme, heres my post saying so.", then don't make posts where you sound like one dick head.
I have zero fear of your nonsense. and I will fall on my sword, in court, to expose you and your agency and the individuals at your agency who engage in any sort of politically-suppressive nonsense.
I will make it a spectacle, big and messy, and subpoena everyone and anyone, to maximize the reputational damage to you and your coworkers, regardless of how it effects me.
I never go to court unless I know I'll win--by all means, fuck around and find out.
(post is archived)