WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I found this guy a few months ago and he now has over 3 million people tuning into his LIVES... I'm guessing here but I think he is the actual person we know as Snowden,,,,

https://rumble.com/v10rsaj-snake-april-12th-2022.html

I found this guy a few months ago and he now has over 3 million people tuning into his LIVES... I'm guessing here but I think he is the actual person we know as Snowden,,,, https://rumble.com/v10rsaj-snake-april-12th-2022.html

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

No. I said he was the 1st person on the list. Please don't put words in my mouth.

He is NOT the real Snowden. Get real dude!

He is grifting our movement and making us all look bad, giving ammunition to the MSM to write hit pieces about us.

Things happen and get released according to the events of the day, the timing of the plan overall, and all in the fullness of time. <

It's not a fixed timeline: > "If this, then that".

[–] 0 pt

Oh, sorry, when you said "#1 on the list" I took that to mean "enemy list" since it was tied to "Fuck around and find out" (which are enemy words). This is what I was basing that impression on...

"We are NOT playing here guys.

FUCK AROUND AND FIND OUT. <

I told you.

This guy is #1 on the list, but there are many more."

[–] 0 pt

Yes. They are fighting words, if that's what you mean.

[–] 0 pt

There's a lot of lists out there...

[–] 1 pt

So which "list" in Godlewski on then? I honestly don't follow what you're saying. When you say, "This guy is #1 on the list" without saying what the list is about (i.e., category), it makes the reader just guess what you meant by that statement. I was merely taking a guess, and I phrased it as a question ("#1 enemy, you say?"), indicating that I wasn't sure what you meant. And I still don't. :-S