I need to go back and look at the watch the water posts to see if there is context.
I think the people who read the posts as they were rolling out were a tiny group.
I think the people who read the posts as they were rolling out were a tiny group.
Agree - as in, if they were a warning, they didn't warn many. Even then, look how many ways (off the top of my head) people who followed Q interpreted that phrase:
Attacks from the water Water shortage Fluoride in water Evergreen stuck in canal Cargo ships stuck offshore
Even among the people paying attention, the number of interpretations served to dilute any meaningful warning.
I don't think Q was trying to warn many. I think Q was trying to communicate with the FBI Anon readers.
I obviously never thought those had any meaning or I wouldn't have kept pursuing it. Interpretations are deadly. It's the problem with leading people to the truth.
Interpretations are deadly. It's the problem with leading people to the truth.
Yes.
(post is archived)