WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

This is probably going to piss a few of you off, but I feel I must say something.

I'm hearing a shitload about this new documentary "Watch the Water" today. I haven't even watched it yet, I'm at work and I do plan on watching it when I get home. However right off the bat red flags were flying for me.

The first thing I noticed when I got up this morning scrolling through the QStorm board was that it was posted 3 different times. One of the posts was from a 2 year old account with 0 posts or comments before making this post. This is a glowie tactic. They create accounts and sit on them for awhile so to appear to be a long time user, and then start spreading nonsense. This post in question got a quite a bit of attention quick, which is another red flag for me.

This is a video of considerable length with no description. These type of posts do not usually see many updoots. Also there are a couple "new users" commenting in the thread. I don't have a problem with new users, I love to see new people here, but this all seems fishy to me.

The second thing is that I don't trust Stew Peters very much at all. He is anti-Q and openly attacks General Flynn and Mike Pompeo al la Lin Wood. It's funny it's called "Watch the Water", a well known quote from Q which would definitely get our attention. I don't 100% trust Flynn or Pompeo, but I sure as hell trust them a lot more than Stew Peters. Only time will tell.

We need to be very careful of what we take in as truth at this crucial stage of the information war. Disinfo is only going to intensify. Like I said, I haven't watched the film yet and I plan to. I'm just stating the anomalies I myself noticed out of the gate before even watching it.

Who knows, it might be excellent, but I have doubts.

This is probably going to piss a few of you off, but I feel I must say something. I'm hearing a shitload about this new documentary "Watch the Water" today. I haven't even watched it yet, I'm at work and I do plan on watching it when I get home. However right off the bat red flags were flying for me. The first thing I noticed when I got up this morning scrolling through the QStorm board was that it was posted 3 different times. One of the posts was from a 2 year old account with 0 posts or comments before making this post. This is a glowie tactic. They create accounts and sit on them for awhile so to appear to be a long time user, and then start spreading nonsense. This post in question got a quite a bit of attention quick, which is another red flag for me. This is a video of considerable length with no description. These type of posts do not usually see many updoots. Also there are a couple "new users" commenting in the thread. I don't have a problem with new users, I love to see new people here, but this all seems fishy to me. The second thing is that I don't trust Stew Peters very much at all. He is anti-Q and openly attacks General Flynn and Mike Pompeo al la Lin Wood. It's funny it's called "Watch the Water", a well known quote from Q which would definitely get our attention. I don't 100% trust Flynn or Pompeo, but I sure as hell trust them a lot more than Stew Peters. Only time will tell. We need to be very careful of what we take in as truth at this crucial stage of the information war. Disinfo is only going to intensify. Like I said, I haven't watched the film yet and I plan to. I'm just stating the anomalies I myself noticed out of the gate before even watching it. Who knows, it might be excellent, but I have doubts.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Another review:

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/watch-the-water?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cta&s=r

FTA: One last point. Venom is highly reactive. This basically means that there are parts of all enzymes that will want to bond with elements (usually oxygen, but also chlorine and others) that will reduce its electrical potential. That is to say, make it more ‘relaxed’ and far less reactive. Thus the idea of dumping any venom, snake or other critter, into a water system is silly. Venom would encounter vast amounts of oxygen, chlorine and all the other chemicals currently polluting the planet. It would be very very unlikely that the venom would survive in a reactive state that would be able to injure your body. And, if the venom was made into a more water stable product, by that very process, it would no longer be reactive enough to cause harm.

Not everyone takes Clif High seriously, but I find him interesting. Take it for what you will.

I like clif, but I am pretty sure he wrote his review without watching the whole thing.