WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

This is probably going to piss a few of you off, but I feel I must say something.

I'm hearing a shitload about this new documentary "Watch the Water" today. I haven't even watched it yet, I'm at work and I do plan on watching it when I get home. However right off the bat red flags were flying for me.

The first thing I noticed when I got up this morning scrolling through the QStorm board was that it was posted 3 different times. One of the posts was from a 2 year old account with 0 posts or comments before making this post. This is a glowie tactic. They create accounts and sit on them for awhile so to appear to be a long time user, and then start spreading nonsense. This post in question got a quite a bit of attention quick, which is another red flag for me.

This is a video of considerable length with no description. These type of posts do not usually see many updoots. Also there are a couple "new users" commenting in the thread. I don't have a problem with new users, I love to see new people here, but this all seems fishy to me.

The second thing is that I don't trust Stew Peters very much at all. He is anti-Q and openly attacks General Flynn and Mike Pompeo al la Lin Wood. It's funny it's called "Watch the Water", a well known quote from Q which would definitely get our attention. I don't 100% trust Flynn or Pompeo, but I sure as hell trust them a lot more than Stew Peters. Only time will tell.

We need to be very careful of what we take in as truth at this crucial stage of the information war. Disinfo is only going to intensify. Like I said, I haven't watched the film yet and I plan to. I'm just stating the anomalies I myself noticed out of the gate before even watching it.

Who knows, it might be excellent, but I have doubts.

This is probably going to piss a few of you off, but I feel I must say something. I'm hearing a shitload about this new documentary "Watch the Water" today. I haven't even watched it yet, I'm at work and I do plan on watching it when I get home. However right off the bat red flags were flying for me. The first thing I noticed when I got up this morning scrolling through the QStorm board was that it was posted 3 different times. One of the posts was from a 2 year old account with 0 posts or comments before making this post. This is a glowie tactic. They create accounts and sit on them for awhile so to appear to be a long time user, and then start spreading nonsense. This post in question got a quite a bit of attention quick, which is another red flag for me. This is a video of considerable length with no description. These type of posts do not usually see many updoots. Also there are a couple "new users" commenting in the thread. I don't have a problem with new users, I love to see new people here, but this all seems fishy to me. The second thing is that I don't trust Stew Peters very much at all. He is anti-Q and openly attacks General Flynn and Mike Pompeo al la Lin Wood. It's funny it's called "Watch the Water", a well known quote from Q which would definitely get our attention. I don't 100% trust Flynn or Pompeo, but I sure as hell trust them a lot more than Stew Peters. Only time will tell. We need to be very careful of what we take in as truth at this crucial stage of the information war. Disinfo is only going to intensify. Like I said, I haven't watched the film yet and I plan to. I'm just stating the anomalies I myself noticed out of the gate before even watching it. Who knows, it might be excellent, but I have doubts.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

I saw the interview, and here is my take. First, the background. I listen to Stew's podcast occasionally, because he has some good guests. I don't agree with all of Stew's opinions, but he seems to also be passionate about some things I agree with.

I thought the interview was weirdly overproduced, with dramatic music, and multiple camera angles, all poorly done, BTW.

The snake venom idea is very interesting as far as the similarities with symptoms and remedies, etc. Where Ardis goes wrong, in my opinion, is the idea that this toxin is being distributed through our water supply. That idea is not well thought out at all. First of all, Ardis made the point (about the venom) that we are talking about very large molecules. Very large molecules are very easy to filter out with a common carbon water filter. And these molecules are also susceptible to chlorine, which is used to purify our water. But probably the biggest reason it wouldn't be practical to distribute through the water supply is the shear volume of water we move around, and the tiny fraction of it that is actually used for drinking and cooking compared to what is used to irrigate lawns and golf courses, fill swimming pools, etc.. They would be wasting massive amounts of this exotic and likely highly expensive poison.

A few other things pointed out by various anons: With water supply poisoning it is usually children and pets who succumb first, like canaries in a coal mine, while covid doesn't seem to affect kids or pets. And Brian Cates says "There is NO WAY bad people have been putting venom in the public water supply on a wide scale basis. That’s one of those nonsense ideas where 100,000 people would all have to be “in on it” with no leaks to keep that conspiracy going."

The bottom line in my opinion is that this is an interesting topic and worthy of a lot more research, but I don't think it really changes anything as far as how it affects us. The information is intriguing, but not personally useful for me or anybody I can think of.

[–] 3 pts

Right, the Remdesiver being venom case was strong, the water thing not so much, he could have stopped there.

But, who knows?

[–] 1 pt

The Rand Corp who is funded by: https://www.rand.org/about/how-we-are-funded.html

This is called the water list for slang because of all the water companies on it But I always find it odd because while I see a lot to be suspicious about the water never really stands out. So I think its interesting that it's called the water list. Been following this one. Not saying Peters is right in this interview, just throwing this out there.

[–] 0 pt

Great points, Red

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I'm interested in hearing your review after watching it.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, I'm very interested in watching it. It's causing quite a stir. I'll definitely give my thoughts, not that they are of any consequence anyway.

[–] 1 pt

I'm curious to hear your opinion.

[–] 3 pts

The guy is a former chiropractor. Not a medical doctor.

He provided zero evidence along with his claims. He sells shit on his website. Huge red flag. https://thedrardisshow.com/

I will say that warning people not to use remdesivir is a good thing. Even if he uses partial truths to do it. But I'm not sold on the whole snake oil... I mean snake venom story

>The guy is a former chiropractor. Not a medical doctor.

True. But all chiropractors claim to be medical doctors, and have for years. In Ardis' favor, someone said he went to medical school before he switched to chiropractic.

[–] 1 pt

As far as I found he has no medical degree. To be fair I did not do a huge dig or anything. Just a couple searches.

I did find that in Nov 2008 he was cited by a city in TN for not keeping his records up to date. Not really a big deal.

https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/health/dar/DAR_november_2008.pdf (direct download)

[–] 0 pt

I'll probably start watching it here in about an hour or so. From what I can tell from everyone it is at very least compelling.

[–] 3 pts

I watched it. Very compelling. But that doesn't make it true. Time will tell.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Another review:

https://clifhigh.substack.com/p/watch-the-water?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=cta&s=r

FTA: One last point. Venom is highly reactive. This basically means that there are parts of all enzymes that will want to bond with elements (usually oxygen, but also chlorine and others) that will reduce its electrical potential. That is to say, make it more ‘relaxed’ and far less reactive. Thus the idea of dumping any venom, snake or other critter, into a water system is silly. Venom would encounter vast amounts of oxygen, chlorine and all the other chemicals currently polluting the planet. It would be very very unlikely that the venom would survive in a reactive state that would be able to injure your body. And, if the venom was made into a more water stable product, by that very process, it would no longer be reactive enough to cause harm.

Not everyone takes Clif High seriously, but I find him interesting. Take it for what you will.

I like clif, but I am pretty sure he wrote his review without watching the whole thing.

[–] 2 pts

I watched the entire interview. My impression is that the person Peters interviewed is sincere, but has allowed himself to make connections that have no rational basis. He's pushing a conspiracy theory, and a wild one at that. I don't believe either Covid or the Covid 'vaccines' are snake venom based. It's as nutty as saying the Twin Towers were brought down by an energy ray. It's just silly. Peters is a fool if he runs with this story.

>It's as nutty as saying the Twin Towers were brought down by an energy ray.

Yeah, or that the steel reinforced towers were penetrated by aluminum airplanes, and a kerosene (jet fuel is kerosene) fire melted the steel columns. That's just silly too.

[–] 2 pts

From all the comments I have seen by those who have watched it the conclusion is DS propoganda designed to distract us with a dubious theory that does not stack up.

[–] 1 pt

Will watch now. I agree with what you said.

Don't get sucked in and distracted please Anons.

[–] 1 pt

It needs to be watched, and I'm not too worried about Stew, as far as being intentionally nefarious, he's had some good stuff on, even if he's skeptical of Flynn and others.

Saw it last night, pretty fascinating.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I just watched it. I highly recommend the whole thing. I did a lot of research on the chiropractor. The 37:00 mark begins addressing the watch the water reference.

From me to you personally, you and I have been going back and forth about that "Water List". This is going to add to that conversation.

I am neither here nor there for Peters. Sometimes I agree with him, sometimes not.

47:00 mark about the origin of the word corona is correct too.

I agree. Discernment is everything. Curious to hear you opinion on this.

Here is the article he references: https://www.thestar.com/business/2021/07/06/fresh-off-vaccine-success-moderna-co-founder-sets-sights-on-venomous-snakebites.html

Here is Ophirex https://www.ophirex.com/

He is correct. From their website they are funded by the united nations and dept of defense, https://www.ophirex.com/funding-and-collaboration

Elevated D-dimer reference: https://www.medscape.com/answers/2085111-196749/how-are-elevated-d-dimer-levels-interpreted

Don't take this to mean that I am supporting this info. I am just trying to present what we know and can know about what he is saying so don't take this to mean I think this is the gospel.

Here is the CDC water tracker as well: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#wastewater-surveillance

Stay safe. There may be truth in this.

[–] 1 pt

What I've always wondered about Stew Peters....

https://pic8.co/sh/o2KAo9.png

[–] 2 pts

The dude seemed to come out of nowhere. Not saying that’s a bad thing, it’s just something to scrutinize.

[–] 1 pt

Agree - possibly one of those rare serendipitous life events...or not.

[–] 0 pt

I've made weirder leaps. Just saying.

[–] 1 pt

I'm not saying it's impossible but to nearly overnight go from his former career to seamless video production and ability to get high-profile guests is unusual.

No doubt my suspicions are raised bc I sent him so much PO stuff that was ignored....until I sent the Braynard stuff - that got a response but seemed more interested in what I knew about Braynard rather than the bigger connection. And that was that.

Load more (1 reply)