I’m just saying.. It’s like that pro-Trump guy who apparently bought CNN…none of us are saying “he’s a shill” for having done so because everyone’s expectation is that he’s going to clean that shit out.. I’m just asking, why aren’t we waiting to see what EM does before attributing any particular motive or ideology to him? 🤷‍♂️ He’s said and done some things that make me say “hell yeah” and some things that have made me say “hell naw”.. But overall, I have a fairly positive opinion of him because I think generally speaking he’s a smart, reasonable, just man. He could prove me wrong and change my mind at any moment. But this particular thing (buying twitter shares) doesn’t necessarily qualify in of itself. Again, I think neuralink is some bullshit..just because of the negative possibilities/consequences…but I have to also admit there are some positive possibilities for healthcare. But I don’t view him as some wicked asshole who is building shit with world domination/slavery in mind. I think he’s got the creativity of a pre-teen who reads a lot of comics and the money/smarts/drive to actually pull some crazy shit off. In other words, I don’t view him as being analogous to Bill Gates or a Rothschild…at least not yet.