I don't have time right this second because I have a deadline at work but I think the answer lies somewhere at this starting point. These videos are most likely legit. As terrifying as it may be to admit. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.4108/eai.28-9-2015.2261410 It says that for body area nanonetworks, bluetooth is best. Although the aforementioned communication systems are associated with certain advantages, radio is by far the most considered option for BANs, due to the convenience of wireless transmission and the availability of a number of mature technologies, namely, Bluetooth. Quoting: the study Goes on: Bluetooth was initially designed for the exchange of audio and data between personal devices, but its range and available data rates make it suitable for off-body transmission of aggregated BAN data. Read this: Some of the most important challenges are associated with the communication channel, and the peculiarities of body-centric radio propagation, where body-shadowing and users’ motion have a significant influence on channel quality. Moreover, the human body strongly affects the radiation characteristics of antennas operating in its close vicinity, which imposes great challenges on antenna design, especially in the case of in- and into-body communications, where antennas are immersed in highly dispersive human tissues And the true potential of such technology? their true potential extends far beyond the current systems, and could be achieved through a collaboration between nano-networks and BANs, allowing for information to be carried from a tissue inside the human body to the outside world. In such a scenario, a nano-network will transfer information to an implant, **where a BAN would carry it to an off-body access point******, from where a large-scale network would be in charge of delivering it to a remote location. This is a patent from 2008 that has been updated several times since. https://patents.google.com/patent/US9526702B2/en and this patent https://patents.google.com/patent/KR20170090373A/en I am copying pasting a few things of note from each below. Note the statements I post in all BOLD below. We have been thinking along the terms of RFID. RFID is too big to ever get in a syringe. Its delivery is under the skin. NOTE THIS BELOW. Also, note that this patent was rejected but that doesn't mean there isn't another one floating around. This technology has been around and in use since the turn of the century. Bi-directional communication with a personal smartphone using Wi-Fi is possible.** Personal information can be recognized by transmitting biometric information of a human body to a smart phone. At the same time, Storing the program in the nano electronic chip so as to recognize the biometric information of the person stored in the phone, A program that allows you to conduct financial transactions without bankbook or deposit card at the bank window (including entry and exit), including the means of sale and settlement of accounts purchased by the merchant computer using Wi-Fi (Wi-Fi) And storing it in a nano electronic chip. ** THESE PATENTS are not new. I've had my eyes on this for awhile and it is why I constantly direct people to keep an eye on the roll out of these CBDCs or ecash or anything else. There has to be an access point for transaction and that will most likely not be a phone or computer but a human. I will keep looking but I have to finish work and won't be able to get to this right away. This is from the first patent. It seems innocent enough. Nano particles to stimulate the immune response in a human but read the language. It is VERY clear. It is why I have been telling people forever to stay away from these "vaccines". These patents basically allow them to inject ANYTHING into your body. Period. If the FDA were real then maybe there would be some protection but this shit show is all a sham. Non-Polymeric Nanocarriers In some embodiments, nanocarriers may not comprise a polymeric component. In some embodiments, nanocarriers may comprise metal particles, quantum dots, ceramic particles, bone particles, viral particles, etc. In some embodiments, an immunomodulatory agent, targeting moiety, and/or immunostimulatory agent can be associated with the surface of such a non-polymeric nanocarrier. In some embodiments, a non-polymeric nanocarrier is an aggregate of non-polymeric components, such as an aggregate of metal atoms (e.g., gold atoms). In some embodiments, an immunomodulatory agent, targeting moiety, and/or immunostimulatory agent can be associated with the surface of, encapsulated within, surrounded by, and/or dispersed throughout an aggregate of non-polymeric components. In certain embodiments of the invention, non-polymeric nanocarriers comprise gradient or homogeneous alloys. In certain embodiments of the invention, nanocarriers comprise particles which possess optically and/or magnetically detectable properties. ONCE YOU TAKE IN THE QUANTUM DOTS of the above patent, match it with this from an article I will link here. "Also, the patch with quantum dots only contains information about the vaccine received." https://sagaciousnewsnetwork.net/quantum-dot-tattoos-hold-vaccination-record/ So the above has a different interface, It's the tattoo patch that dissolves on the skin BUT PAY ATTENTION -- in order for that to even work the QUANTUM DOTS have to already be in the person. The below is copied and pasted from the patent and is noteworthy. Particles Associated with Vaccine Nanocarriers In some embodiments, vaccine nanocarriers in accordance with the present invention may comprise one or more particles. In some embodiments, one or more particles are associated with a vaccine nanocarrier. In some embodiments, vaccine nanocarriers comprise one or more particles associated with the outside surface of the nanocarrier. In some embodiments, particles may be associated with vaccine nanocarriers via covalent linkage. In some embodiments, particles may be associated with vaccine nanocarriers via non-covalent interactions (e.g., charge interactions, affinity interactions, metal coordination, physical adsorption, host-guest interactions, hydrophobic interactions, TT stacking interactions, hydrogen bonding interactions, van der Waals interactions, magnetic interactions, electrostatic interactions, dipole-dipole interactions, and/or combinations thereof). In some embodiments, vaccine nanocarriers comprise one or more particles encapsulated within the nanocarrier. In some embodiments, vaccine nanocarriers comprise one or more particles embedded within the surface of the nanocarrier (e.g., embedded within a lipid bilayer). In some embodiments, particles associated with a nanocarrier allow for tunable membrane rigidity and controllable liposome stability. In some embodiments, particles to be associated with a vaccine nanocarrier may comprise a polymeric matrix, as described above. In some embodiments, particles to be associated with a vaccine nanocarrier may comprise non-polymeric components (e.g., metal particles, quantum dots, ceramic particles, bone particles, viral particles, etc.), as described above. This is a lot to unpack but if you REALLY want to bunk/debunk we're gonna have to dig. More info about quantum dots from the shill globalists at MIT https://www.genengnews.com/topics/drug-discovery/quantum-dots-deliver-vaccines-and-invisibly-encode-vaccination-history-in-skin/

Neat story. Now tell us one about mole men and how they take our wiimen underground. We know it's true because there are caves. Next, look up the logical fallacy, false equivalence.

> But they are NOT using mainstream tech mate. > bluetooth Pick one. Lol.