WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

716

Something odd is happening in the background of the G7 energy ministers’ announcement earlier today.

Remember that moment {HERE} when Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland seemed really uncomfortable and weird at the presser – just 36 hours before the Trudeau administration announced they were going to drop the Emergency Act banking sanctions against the truckers?

Here is an encapsulation of what’s weird, and you don’t have to be an expert in geopolitics and international trade to see it:

The G7 countries (including the U.S.) announced today they were demanding that Russia accept payment for oil and gas in euros and dollars. This is happening at the same time NATO is demanding (via sanctions) that Russia be blocked from accepting payments in euros and dollars. Something is weird. Keep in mind, the same nations in the G7 are the same nations in NATO with the exception of Japan (G7 only).

Saudi Arabia is not returning phone calls from the Biden administration, and the extended OPEC-plus are not following the sanctions regime of the western NATO alliance. Which makes sense, because Opec+ includes Russia, and the geopolitical dynamic appears to have fractured around the energy sector, with the western alliance chasing renewable energy and the non-sanction countries staying on course with oil and gas.

Together the WEF, IMF, WB, WTO, EU central banks and U.S. federal reserve, collectively represent what we call the globalists. And the globalists are pushing the climate change agenda hard {WEF LINK}.

My hunch is the demand for Russia to accept payment in euros and dollars is directly connected to the G7 worrying about losing climate change leverage with the non-sanction countries around the issue of energy. For the globalists, it’s not just the loss of the petro-dollar at stake, it’s losing the accompanying leverage they have to enforce their climate change mission.

Something odd is happening in the background of the G7 energy ministers’ announcement earlier today. Remember that moment {HERE} when Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland seemed really uncomfortable and weird at the presser – just 36 hours before the Trudeau administration announced they were going to drop the Emergency Act banking sanctions against the truckers? Here is an encapsulation of what’s weird, and you don’t have to be an expert in geopolitics and international trade to see it: The G7 countries (including the U.S.) announced today they were demanding that Russia accept payment for oil and gas in euros and dollars. This is happening at the same time NATO is demanding (via sanctions) that Russia be blocked from accepting payments in euros and dollars. Something is weird. Keep in mind, the same nations in the G7 are the same nations in NATO with the exception of Japan (G7 only). Saudi Arabia is not returning phone calls from the Biden administration, and the extended OPEC-plus are not following the sanctions regime of the western NATO alliance. Which makes sense, because Opec+ includes Russia, and the geopolitical dynamic appears to have fractured around the energy sector, with the western alliance chasing renewable energy and the non-sanction countries staying on course with oil and gas. Together the WEF, IMF, WB, WTO, EU central banks and U.S. federal reserve, collectively represent what we call the globalists. And the globalists are pushing the climate change agenda hard {WEF LINK}. My hunch is the demand for Russia to accept payment in euros and dollars is directly connected to the G7 worrying about losing climate change leverage with the non-sanction countries around the issue of energy. For the globalists, it’s not just the loss of the petro-dollar at stake, it’s losing the accompanying leverage they have to enforce their climate change mission.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Brother, the G-7 is in no real position on telling Putin what denomination Russia prefers to paid in, they can either pay as requested or freeze. Now Russia is accepting gold in payments and bitcoin. He did give them options.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

This is the equivalent of an armed robber facing unexpected resistance, and flabbergasted, sputtering out the motivation for the robbery. "But-bu-- I NEED THIS BECAUSE XYZ!"

It's that reflex.

Happens when a clerk says "no fuck you. Why should I give you the contents of my register? Fuck off", instead of cowering in fear and cooperating as was expected of them.

Shit, reverse the roles for a minute.

You know the korean store scene in Falling Down? The moment the korean store owner realizes hes fucked up and is explaining himself right before he gets mad?

This is that. Russia is the protagonist "William" (from falling down), having none of the store owners bullshit.

The response the u.s. is having here amounts to the same thing.

Like the korean store owner, the next move the u.s. would make, is to grab a weapon.

I suspect russia has anticipated this already though.

That or its strategic floundering combine with an attempt to appear unified (bravado).

This also looks like a potential break between the us economic security sector (IMF) and the western economic bloc (G7) aka the WEF.

If I'm correct then we should soon see announcements of japan in talks with either russia or with those nations that have considered switching to the ruble.

[–] 1 pt

I like your analogy here with the movie Falling Down. Perfect. As for the next moves? If the western world's economies are contracting with all this free money being printed then take away some of the money and you have a much larger contraction. Contractions are good. They usually get rid of bad investments.

BUT, if the US dollar's worth is based on the petro dollar and half (or more) of the world's oil will be bought in a currency other than the US Dollar then there is a fast diminishing value of the dollar on top of the contraction. All of this is because of the IMF, BIS and all the other "world" economic systems put in place since WWII and Bretton Woods.

My guess is the Western World ex. WEF and all the other parasites in Geneva and Basel will bow to this threat. I wait for the big guy in Rome to give an indication. All the power in the Knights of Malta, Jesuits and the Vatican and we hear nothing but silence.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

half (or more) of the world's oil will be bought in a currency other than the US Dollar

Russia, last I heard, provides what, 8% of the oil?

While many countries may or may not be genuine in questioning the status of the u.s. dollar, especially the sauds, india, venezuela, etc, their final pronouncement on that will likely be dependent on the outcome of the ukraine conflict. The u.s. is used to having a "fence" to run its laundered money and other black budget operations, so the longer it has held on to it, the tighter it will attempt to hold now--the current scenario being an example of that.

It's not a confident move, and speaks to lack of development of alternatives, thats the take away, how precious ukraine is to u.s. international operations. Like a lynchpin, or the pin in a grenade. Russia just dared to pull it. Ukraine being the "weakest link" to Russia, would be such an effective move, that I struggle to see it as anything at this moment except intentional on Russia's part. Allow your enemy into a key place, to build up a network at your proverbial doorstep, the threat of whom legitimizes any level of response you might have. Sort of like those lure fish in the depths of the ocean. Entice an opponent with opportunity, or strategic weakness, a nation supposedly underdefended by the KGB or russian military, who, if captured by the u.s., would cut off russian gas, cut off russian deep water naval access, control a huge chunk of eastern europe grain export, the works.

And then when they get cozy, spring the bear trap on their greedy hands, and come out clean despite having set the trap to begin with. You know what they say if your enemy is making a mistake, why interrupt them?, and clearly russia lives by this, otherwise the foolish u.s. occupation government we all live under wouldn't have fallen into such a pit to begin with.

I think, if a broader war doesn't come out of this, what will result is a tentative attempt by the u.s. to parlay a truce and new agreement, which the u.s. will have no intent of keeping--no matter what we offer or how the u.s. claims this time is different from past treaty obligations. It'll be purely an attempt to buy time.

My guess is the Western World ex. WEF and all the other parasites in Geneva and Basel will bow to this threat.

Bingo, but never underestimate the desperate and minor factions in a power struggle. They're trying not to knock over the table they're all playing at.

All the power in the Knights of Malta, Jesuits and the Vatican and we hear nothing but silence.

I don't know about malta, the jesuits, etc, but theres two reasons typically, when big players go silent, theres pantshitting happening, or they're up to something. It could also be they took the long view of this, which is that this entire thing is overblown and petty, which would say to me the college of bishops and the papacy doesn't approve of the u.s. approach. Would explain the lack of pressure from them on russia, and the calls to 'consecrate' russia.

If they're floundering on this, it tells me the church is perhaps moribund, because why wouldn't they attempt to cut the east orthodox church's throat? Thats basic rules of competition at that scale In the face of competition from american protestantism and asian materialism, the church has to be as unified as possible, reducing competition as much as possible. On the otherhand, the orthodox is a sort of "idealogical buffer state", where even if the orthodox church OR the catholic church were eliminated, the other would survive, and be strengthened, embolded, and more unified, so taking out one or the other by themselves would be a mistake.

I see now that the logical conclusion for the church's behavior, for not putting serious pressure on russia (assuming I'm correct), is because they've rightly concluded russia falling would eventually lead to the failure of orthodoxy, which in turn would eventually lead to the catholic church being significantly more vulnerable in the long-term global culture wars.

The best possible move (out of two bad options - passing up the opportunity to eliminate competition vs aiding competition), is therefore for the jesuits to aid and bolster russia while undermining the west (the u.s.) and the european union.

[–] 1 pt

Great comments. Nice to meet another thinker.

I take a different view on the Vatican and the Jesuits. The 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia defines the Rothschilds as the "keepers of the papal treasure". We know how they use other people's money to enrich themselves but the Church is more like the Mafia. SO if you are keeping the Papal treasure and all of a sudden you are opening Central Banks (ex. Bank of England) what would the Mafia do? Well, you know. SO i come from the perspective that the whole western central banking system is Rothchild and company controlled but the Papacy is behind the curtain. They need to stay behind the curtain so they send the pope out to say things like "the planet is our responsibility" hence the green agenda. My take is this is all possible because of the Petro Dollar. Unless the Vatican is with the Russians, which I doubt, they are looking at a major hit at revenue not seen since the Reformation.

Interesting times we live in.