Yeah, it's so easy to get our hopes up at first wind of something exciting like that (I'm certainly guilty of doing that). But then once we put on your discernment glasses and start pouring over all the available evidence, we start seeing 'tells' and clues that it's likely contrived. :-( Glad I got links to both of these videos to examine it with my own eyes/ears though, even if I started seeing/hearing stuff that made me doubt it. Truth over lies is always preferred, IMO.
> Glad I got links to both of these videos to examine it with my own eyes/ears though,
You and me both. I very much appreciate you and others like you, discernment, able to change and say you might be wrong when suspicions arise and when justified.
I know many people in the JFK research community and there are some who stubbornly refuse to change when evidence shows they were wrong, because they have some book out, and years of research they've published.
They just make their problem worse by refusing to embrace any new evidence or research that upends their own stuff.
There's a well known minister, mainly wrote back in the forties, he actually publicly stated that one of his first books was completely wrong, and asked people to ignore it, don't buy it, don't recommend it, toss it out.
That takes integrity, hard to find nowadays.
Thanks for saying that. I didn't have very much info or even know who this guy was when I initially posted this. Was just really excited to have a sprinkle of hopium to share. Then I got the guy's name and got the link to his full 3/11 'announcement video' on Bitchute and started getting some bad vibes.
Then when I got the link to his 3/13 YouTube podcast and saw how he went into more detail about his supposed encounter, and I watched him totally change his story just a couple days later, praise Negative 48, and order the censorship of anyone who didn't like Neg 48, I was like, "Oh, there's something really wrong here."
Really bummed that this B-12 shot fizzled out so quickly, but it's better to be real and share one's impressions than to pretend like the spidey senses didn't get triggered with this upon closer examination. Sorry to let anyone down though!
>Sorry to let anyone down though!
No way, people need to judge everything individually and unless it's posted we can't do that.
And who knows, maybe there is something to it, you never know.
It's crazy out here. I grew up with three TV channels telling me what I need to know, to heck with that.
Back then everything came AT you, now, you can go to IT. And make your own decisions. It's fantastic.
(post is archived)