In that video of Nuland, she was responding to a question from Marco Rubio. The link I posted didn’t include his question, but if you see the version that does include his question, you’ll notice that he asks her specifically about bio weapons labs in Ukraine.
She could have answered with a flat “no” if these facilities had nothing to do with “weapons”, but that’s not how she answered.
With both his question and her answer taken into context, it seems abundantly clear that whatever was being researched in those labs is dangerous…otherwise, our government wouldn’t be too concerned with whether or not the Russians got a hold of it.
And if it’s dangerous (which again, it clearly is), then it could be considered a “weapon”.
I was agreeing with your position for the most part up until that video dropped. I didn’t have any proof to say one way or another until then. But watching that video, especially with Rubio’s actual question being considered, it’s obvious what’s going on with those labs.
Now, you are making assumptions on some things, such as the idea that “they would put them out in the country side…”
Yeah, one would think.. but again, “acme tractor” etc. they very well may hide that shit in plain sight for all you know.
My point is, neither you or I can make assumptions and treat them as known facts..this is a principle you seemed to properly adhere to, but for some reason departed from when it comes to your assumptions that “they’d never put a lab like that in a city” or “surely they’d sent SEALs in to get them out before…”
I’m just going off of what we know to be factual.
And what’s factual is that woman answered Rubio’s question the way she did, and there are obvious implications from that answer.
What’s factual is what happened in Wuhan and out government’s role in it.
None of this is to say that Russian propaganda and misinformation doesn’t exist, it does.
But so does American propaganda and misinformation.
Point being, it very well may be that the Russians aren’t bullshitting about this. Even a broken clock is right twice a day FFS.
Unfortunately, I can’t honestly say that Putin is necessarily a bigger liar than Biden or anyone in our government..especially after the last 5-6 years, and even more especially after the last two years with all the COVID fuckery.
he could have answered with a flat “no” if these facilities had nothing to do with “weapons”, but that’s not how she answered.
With both his question and her answer taken into context, it seems abundantly clear that whatever was being researched in those labs is dangerous…otherwise, our government wouldn’t be too concerned with whether or not the Russians got a hold of it.
Or you could just be reading too much into how some woman mishandled a press confernece and how the media has seized upon something innocuous and blown it up for for shits and giggles
and the UN says it's BS, so there's no real facts on this imo
“and the UN says it's BS”
Oh, well then it MUST be true cuz the UN said so, LOL.
Were you on Reddit, somehow got lost, and wound up here?
(post is archived)