I don't think being a "patriot" and a proponent of "freeze peach" are mutually exclusive! Do you?
No - I agree they aren't the same thing.
That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related.
I'm sorry, not meaning to give you a hard time httbmc - I like you and your comments, but I do NOT like Musk. He's a drug-abusing, satan-worshiper-dater, cartel-associating, subsidy-sucker - and if he proves otherwise, you have my absolute permission to tar and feather me for as long as we both exist :-)
I think you made it clear that you have a hard on ... or hard in..(how ever that works) for Musk. kek
If he proves otherwise to your opinion of him.. I wouldn't want to tar and feather you... maybe a good spanking though would be warranted! ;)
;-)
"That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related. "
He (Musk) sent them to Ukraine, right? What's your thoughts about an alternative motive?
Yes - at the request of this guy who would not be pushing digital ID if he wasn't a DS asset: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykhailo_Fedorov who supports Digital ID as outlined here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Digital_Transformation
Definitely not helpful to Patriots.
Would not surprise me at all if the DS needed Starlink for their own comms in Ukraine and/or to identify/target Ukrainian Patriots. But I could be entirely wrong.
(post is archived)