No - I agree they aren't the same thing.
That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related.
I'm sorry, not meaning to give you a hard time httbmc - I like you and your comments, but I do NOT like Musk. He's a drug-abusing, satan-worshiper-dater, cartel-associating, subsidy-sucker - and if he proves otherwise, you have my absolute permission to tar and feather me for as long as we both exist :-)
I think you made it clear that you have a hard on ... or hard in..(how ever that works) for Musk. kek
If he proves otherwise to your opinion of him.. I wouldn't want to tar and feather you... maybe a good spanking though would be warranted! ;)
;-)
"That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related. "
He (Musk) sent them to Ukraine, right? What's your thoughts about an alternative motive?
Yes - at the request of this guy who would not be pushing digital ID if he wasn't a DS asset: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykhailo_Fedorov who supports Digital ID as outlined here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Digital_Transformation
Definitely not helpful to Patriots.
Would not surprise me at all if the DS needed Starlink for their own comms in Ukraine and/or to identify/target Ukrainian Patriots. But I could be entirely wrong.
Wow...never been down that rabbit hole! You're Good! ;) That would certainly lend to the corruption and DS control...and not to mention the criminals here supporting them..ie. Bydans, Romneys, Kerrys, etc.. If Putins intentions were to clean out the cockroaches there, and snipped comm lines, that would explain the hast to get Musks Starlink online asap..! That also certainly does lead to the assumption of Musk being a POS!
(post is archived)