Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

239

It crossed my mind that the letters O-W-L might refer to some One World group or organization, and the word LEAGUE fit the bill for the L.

So I looked up 'One World League' on Google and found these:

https://www.facebook.com/oneworldleague

https://owlvoter.com/

OWL Vision To create the opportunity, through the exploitation of the latest information technology and social networking for all eligible people, anywhere, to be able to express their views on critical policies, to in turn achieve a harmonious global community.

Cyberdemocracy The concept of Cyberdemocracy, as defined by OWL, is the improvement of the concept of democracy via technology. We aim to leverage technology and cybercommunications to reduce corruption and give citizens the voice to truly have their say – through technology we aim to establish true democracy.

Assigning Representatives Through a random selection method, senators will be chosen – much like jury duty – to form Government on a staggered, rolling basis. This allows for a wide range of voices in Government and lowers the chance of corruption.

True Equality In the OWL system, senators are chosen by random selection to serve a term in Government. This “jury-duty style” method will ensure true equality – not only across race and gender, but also across demographics and geographic locations.

Voting and Policies Through the cyberdemocracy concept, major issues could be voted on via a secure, internet-based plebiscite method. The average citizen will have more opportunities to voice their opinions and shape society, without the cost of constant in-person ballots.

Current Status OWL needs passionate members, and a leader! As a political movement, there’s no limit on who can join and help shape the movement. Are you OWL’s future spokesperson?

More on their website here:

https://owlvoter.com/what-is-owl/#OwlPolicies

Who are they? Their website doesn't appear to give any indication of members, donors, shareholders, etc.

I also found this, which is a thesis written by a man named David Richard Stevens in 2018. It appears that he was involved in creating the group:

https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/129410/6/02whole.pdf

Whoever OWL is, they look like a New World Order scheme based on digital IDs to me.

Keep an eye on this OWL.....

It crossed my mind that the letters O-W-L might refer to some One World group or organization, and the word LEAGUE fit the bill for the L. So I looked up 'One World League' on Google and found these: https://www.facebook.com/oneworldleague https://owlvoter.com/ >OWL Vision >To create the opportunity, through the exploitation of the latest information technology and social networking for all eligible people, anywhere, to be able to express their views on critical policies, to in turn achieve a harmonious global community. >Cyberdemocracy >The concept of Cyberdemocracy, as defined by OWL, is the improvement of the concept of democracy via technology. We aim to leverage technology and cybercommunications to reduce corruption and give citizens the voice to truly have their say – through technology we aim to establish true democracy. >Assigning Representatives >Through a random selection method, senators will be chosen – much like jury duty – to form Government on a staggered, rolling basis. This allows for a wide range of voices in Government and lowers the chance of corruption. >True Equality >In the OWL system, senators are chosen by random selection to serve a term in Government. This “jury-duty style” method will ensure true equality – not only across race and gender, but also across demographics and geographic locations. >Voting and Policies >Through the cyberdemocracy concept, major issues could be voted on via a secure, internet-based plebiscite method. The average citizen will have more opportunities to voice their opinions and shape society, without the cost of constant in-person ballots. >Current Status >OWL needs passionate members, and a leader! As a political movement, there’s no limit on who can join and help shape the movement. Are you OWL’s future spokesperson? More on their website here: https://owlvoter.com/what-is-owl/#OwlPolicies Who are they? Their website doesn't appear to give any indication of members, donors, shareholders, etc. I also found this, which is a thesis written by a man named David Richard Stevens in 2018. It appears that he was involved in creating the group: https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/bitstream/10453/129410/6/02whole.pdf Whoever OWL is, they look like a New World Order scheme based on digital IDs to me. Keep an eye on this OWL.....

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] • 0 pt

Well considering the Facebook page only has 579 followers and the website directs people to the Facebook site. I would say that's a dead lead. Good thought though.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

That's not so important. More important is that many NGOs are forming with the same DS agenda. Big or small, they all lead back to that same agenda. They might look like a grass-roots organization like this one, but there's always more to them than meets the eye of the average normie.

They are out there in numbers to make their one ideology seem popular. They draw people into accepting a particular way of life that begins to become normalized over time and repetition.

The symbology is one of the things that ties them. So are the purposes of these separate NGOs.

When you see a pattern, it signifies something deeper.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, they all lead back to the same agenda. Not only do they use them to normalize the crazy, the NGOs are crucial to implementing policy and regulation. Years ago, I was reading minutes of an Atlantic Council? meeting, and someone in the meeting was explaining how useful the NGOs are bc they can work with the government on behalf of corporations without having the bad optics of a corporation directly involved. Of course, they also use them to launder money, as you already know.

Getting rid of these NGOs is one of the smartest things we can do. At the very least, we need to rein in the ones that are illegally enjoying tax-exempt status - which is most of them.

[–] • 0 pt

That's not so important.

In the context of the post title and the content of the OP itself it is. Your reply, while related, is off topic from your original post. I try my best to stay on topic and keep my replies focused directly on the context of the post to which I am replying.

My response was valid. That website is NOT what 'OWL' is. Check out the links I posted in the comments. I think you will like the material. Its just audio from old podcasts. I also added the whole series to the Occult sub just now.

[–] • 0 pt

You said it was a dead lead. I replied by extending the message I was trying to convey.

[–] • 0 pt

Are you just following me around critiquing my posts now?

[–] • 0 pt

I can't see FB - any idea when the first posts started?

[–] • 1 pt

May 10, 2017 was first post

Random screenshot https://pic8.co/d/bfc9a0bb-8c0e-4029-9251-0557562d2569.png

Appears they aren't fans of the Rothschild's https://pic8.co/d/64f7200e-0374-4ba6-aff2-b5ea0662e254.png

Site from the last screenshot https://howtheworldreallyworks.info/

[–] • 1 pt

Appears they aren't fans of the Rothschild's

Looks can be deceiving.

The Hegelian formula and all that.....

[–] • 0 pt

Thank you. It does look pretty inactive - one of the things I've noticed is that they commonly keep these sites online and resurrect them if needed.