WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

962

“Snowfalls are just a thing of the past” — the AGW narrative.

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s latest annual climate report doesn’t link human activity to global warming (though the agency does continue to insinuate it) — and thanks to the dogged efforts of no-nonsense Aussie politician Malcolm Roberts, the BOM has admitted as much.

Roberts writes: Whenever I ask politicians to prove climate change is real and caused by humans they always point to the Bureau of Meteorology report, State of the Climate. But the report only publishes temperatures and observations, it doesn’t link any changes with carbon dioxide created by humans. The BOM admits in questioning (linked below) that the report itself simply confirms that the climate is variable without attributing a cause for it. If this is the case, why do politicians and so-called experts keep claiming this report proves carbon dioxide from humans is a danger and must be cut?

Moreover, the last two annual climate reports reveal the Aussies continent has actual COOLED, yet the agency has slyly tweaked the wording and date-ranges used in its reports so as not to draw attention to it — they are lying by omission.

This was noticed by Jennifer Marohasy, an Australian scientist and author. The below text is lifted from her website:

At the beginning of each year, normally within the first week, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology release their annual climate statement for the previous year with comment about how much hotter it is relative to temperatures back to 1910.

>“Snowfalls are just a thing of the past” — the AGW narrative. The Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s latest annual climate report doesn’t link human activity to global warming (though the agency does continue to insinuate it) — and thanks to the dogged efforts of no-nonsense Aussie politician Malcolm Roberts, the BOM has admitted as much. Roberts writes: Whenever I ask politicians to prove climate change is real and caused by humans they always point to the Bureau of Meteorology report, State of the Climate. But the report only publishes temperatures and observations, it doesn’t link any changes with carbon dioxide created by humans. The BOM admits in questioning (linked below) that the report itself simply confirms that the climate is variable without attributing a cause for it. If this is the case, why do politicians and so-called experts keep claiming this report proves carbon dioxide from humans is a danger and must be cut? Moreover, the last two annual climate reports reveal the Aussies continent has actual COOLED, yet the agency has slyly tweaked the wording and date-ranges used in its reports so as not to draw attention to it — they are lying by omission. This was noticed by Jennifer Marohasy, an Australian scientist and author. The below text is lifted from her website: At the beginning of each year, normally within the first week, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology release their annual climate statement for the previous year with comment about how much hotter it is relative to temperatures back to 1910.

(post is archived)