WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

829

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The woman was paid to act the part.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

But why? There are actual injured people that could be photographed. It’s not like no one has been injured. Why would they need to pay someone to be fake injured or to put on injury make up? I’d like to see proof that the woman in the 2018 photograph is the same as the woman in all of the other photographs. And it’s absolutely not unusual for multiple outlets to use pictures from the same photo shoot. Often times they go over wire and the news agencies pluck them off the wire. So that’s not unusual at all. Now if this is the same woman in the 2018 photograph, then yes, that’s fucked up. But prove it.

And again, why in the world would they go back to the same woman they used in 2018 when, all around these photographers, they were actual real injured people? Makes no sense.

Of course the media is lying about what’s happening in Ukraine, they are lying about Russia, they are lying about the motivations, and they are lying about a lot of the violence. But there’s no shortage of injured people to photograph. What would be the purpose? That doesn’t make any fucking sense.