I've read this, that Q started the same day Durham was appointed. I didn't personally verify it but no reason to doubt it.
And that first post showed the 'Durham' boat (in the famous painting) that Washington crossed the Delaware in.
Later in another post Q confirmed that an 'autist' had correctly identified a clue, that this boat was a Durham boat, invented by Robert Durham. The clue obviously was that John Durham would be key to everything.
A few days ago Trump in a statement purposely misstated John Durham's name as 'Robert Durham.' Obviously confirming Q once again.
I doubt John himself is Q (like you say) but likely a part of the team. Q of course is supposedly a group of not more than ten, most of which are military.
I think Dan Scavino is part of the group.
There's too much evidence that Q and Trump are tied at the hip, so I've always said, if Q is 'bad' then Trump is bad.
So if the logic is that Q is a psy op and that Trump is a crypto jew then fine, that's logical. But to say that Trump is 'good' but Q is not, is not logical.
Thank you for actually answering what I was asking. Yeah I find that stuff pretty exciting. The things I’m into mostly are the Durham investigation and devolution because I think there are facts and actions behind both of them, and not just drawing red lines around one box of numbers and letters to a picture with other red lines around another series of numbers that lead to another series of dates and clues.
The stuff that you mentioned is the stuff that gets my blood pumping. Pretty exciting stuff.
Yes, agreed!
(Poal is back lol.)
(post is archived)