You know, one of the theories that I’m not sure I agree with but is extremely interesting to me is that Q is someone close to Durham.
Is it true, I read it elsewhere, but you guys can confirm to me, that Q drops started on the day that Durham was activated? Of all the things that many Q followers think of as “proofs“, many of them patently ridiculous, that one would be pretty spot on and almost undeniable.
I've read this, that Q started the same day Durham was appointed. I didn't personally verify it but no reason to doubt it.
And that first post showed the 'Durham' boat (in the famous painting) that Washington crossed the Delaware in.
Later in another post Q confirmed that an 'autist' had correctly identified a clue, that this boat was a Durham boat, invented by Robert Durham. The clue obviously was that John Durham would be key to everything.
A few days ago Trump in a statement purposely misstated John Durham's name as 'Robert Durham.' Obviously confirming Q once again.
I doubt John himself is Q (like you say) but likely a part of the team. Q of course is supposedly a group of not more than ten, most of which are military.
I think Dan Scavino is part of the group.
There's too much evidence that Q and Trump are tied at the hip, so I've always said, if Q is 'bad' then Trump is bad.
So if the logic is that Q is a psy op and that Trump is a crypto jew then fine, that's logical. But to say that Trump is 'good' but Q is not, is not logical.
Thank you for actually answering what I was asking. Yeah I find that stuff pretty exciting. The things I’m into mostly are the Durham investigation and devolution because I think there are facts and actions behind both of them, and not just drawing red lines around one box of numbers and letters to a picture with other red lines around another series of numbers that lead to another series of dates and clues.
The stuff that you mentioned is the stuff that gets my blood pumping. Pretty exciting stuff.
Yes, agreed!
(Poal is back lol.)
A lot of bad info does indeed come from overzealous Q followers, like the John Kennedy Jr. theory, the press takes that and runs with it and paints everyone as kooks.
Yes, and it’s not fair. It really isn’t. That’s why I get so angry at “Q“ people who promote complete and utter bullshit like clones that are adults who are fully formed, and other such bullshit. Because they make all of us look bad. Yes, I just said “us“. Because even though I don’t believe a lot of the things that “Q“ people believe, I do believe there’s something to devolution in the Durham investigation and I do believe there is something going on behind the scenes that I can’t even fathom.
>Because they make all of us look bad.
Yes, reminds me of this verse in the NT..
"But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth; and some to honour, and some to dishonour."
The Q society is one 'great house.' Lots of different folks join the ranks, attracts kooks and thinkers alike. (Well not to say that kooks don't think lol.)
(post is archived)